To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

FINBOND GROUP LIMITED - GCR Affirms Finbond Group Limiteds Rating of BBB(ZA); Outlook Stable

Release Date: 24/12/2018 10:00
Code(s): FGL     PDF:  
 
Wrap Text
GCR Affirms Finbond Group Limited’s Rating of BBB(ZA); Outlook Stable

FINBOND GROUP LIMITED
(Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
(Registration number: 2001/015761/06)
Share code: “FGL”
ISIN: ZAE000138095
(“Finbond” or “the Company” or “the Group")

GCR AFFIRMS FINBOND GROUP LIMITED’S RATING OF BBB(ZA); OUTLOOK STABLE

Shareholders are advised that Global Credit Ratings has affirmed the national
scale ratings assigned to Finbond Group Limited of BBB(ZA) and A3(ZA) in the long
term and short term respectively; with the outlook accorded as Stable. At the
same time, Global Credit Ratings has affirmed the long-term international scale
local currency rating assigned to Finbond Group Limited of B+; with the outlook
accorded as Stable.
SUMMARY RATING RATIONALE
Global Credit Ratings (“GCR”) has accorded the above credit ratings to Finbond
Group Limited (“Finbond” or “the group”) based on the following key assumptions:

  •   The ratings on Finbond reflect its monoline market segment, good
      geographic diversification, strong capitalisation supported by good
      internal capital generation, weak risk position, stable funding and robust
      liquidity.

  •   The company profile is a negative rating factor balancing the predominant
      focus of unsecured lending, small market share, good geographic diversity
      relative to peers. While the secured lending product is being rundown,
      the monoline strategy of unsecured lending exposes the group to increased
      risk from credit events and regulation just to mention a few. On the
      other hand, the geographical expansion of the group into North America
      has strengthened its competitive position. In addition, better earnings
      diversification is also viewed positively, with c.63% of the group’s
      earnings currently generated by international businesses, with the
      expectation to grow this to c. 70-80% in 3 to 5 years.

  •   Finbond’s capitalisation is strong and is one of the key factors
      supporting its rating. The equity/total assets ratio registered within
      strong range (48.2% at 1H19). Conversion of shareholder loans (R365m) to
      Tier 1 equity during 1H19 has also helped capitalisation which we view
      to be stronger as a result. The group’s banking subsidiary Finbond Mutual
      Bank had a capital adequacy ratio of 34.8%, reflecting a good headroom
      above the regulatory minimum. Over the next two years, we expect
      capitalisation to range around 35-40%, supported by internal capital
      generation which in part benefits from the favourable profiles of acquired
      short term lenders as required by the group’s investment criteria. But
      also, annualised margins are high given the short term nature of assets
      while financing is long term.

  •   The group’s funding is stable, which lessens the risk of this entity
      defaulting. Equity, term deposits, and shareholder loans are the major
      funding sources. Liquidity is robust, supported by high collections on
      short term loans averaging 94% during the year. Basel III liquidity
      coverage ratio of 168% vs regulatory minimum of 90% supports this
      liquidity assessment.

•   Risk position is weak, demonstrated by the high write offs. Adoption of
    IFRS 9 resulted in the group changing the write off policy from a
    delinquency approach (1AS 39) to a staging approach based on expected
    recoveries. Because of Finbond’s quick write off cycle under IAS 39, off
    balance sheet bad debts were brought back on balance sheet as the group
    still expect collections on these accounts. This escalates the arrears
    ratio to 66.2%, however with no material impact on earnings expected
    given a loan loss reserve coverage of 85.1%. In addition, the group
    recovers on average 28.9% of bad debts written off within the same year.
    Collections from the USA portfolio continued to be higher relative to
    South Africa, although the group’s average declined to 83% at 1H19.

•   The upside rating movement is sensitive to increased contribution to
    earnings by the international business, sustained capital and liquidity
    positions, diversification of business to more of transactional banking,
    and material improvement in asset quality. While downside pressure may
    stem from capitalisation reducing materially, worsening asset quality and
    reserving, coupled with unstable funding structure.


    Pretoria
    24 December 2018

    Sponsor:   Grindrod Bank Limited

Date: 24/12/2018 10:00:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.

Email this JSE Sens Item to a Friend.

Share This Story