Wrap Text
Summarised audited results for the nine months ended 31 December 2012 - NFGOVI
NEWFUNDS GOVI EXCHANGE TRADED FUND PORTFOLIO
Share code: NFGOVI
ISIN: ZAE000161949
(“NEWFUNDS GOVI” or “the ETF”)
A Portfolio in the NewFunds Collective Investment Scheme in Securities registered as such in terms of the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, 45 of 2002
Preparer / Compiler : The financial statements were independently compiled by Ernst & Young Advisory Services
Proprietary Limited. Director : Cleedon Botha CA(SA)
Supervised by : These financial statements are under the direction and supervision of the Chief Financial officer of
Corporate and Investment Banking and Wealth ("CIBW"), Rolf Stromsoe CA(SA)
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012
Period ended Period ended
31 December 2012 31 March 2012
R R
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Investments: GOVI Portfolio 41,906,547 37,592,572
Current assets
Trade and other receivables 728,468 480,290
Cash and cash equivalents 589,227 287,150
Total assets 43,224,242 38,360,012
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 11,770 21,146
Net assets attributable to investors 43,212,472 38,338,866
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012
Period ended Period ended
31 December 2012 31 March 2012
R R
Revenue , ,
2,444,631 , ,
1,216,582
Interest income 8,462 682
Coupon income 2 436 169 1,215,900
Realised gains on financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or
loss 291,666 36,825
Unrealised (loss)on financial instruments designated at fair value through profit or
loss 2,235,412 (424,961)
Other operating expenditure
Management and administration expenses ( 98 103) ( 22 535)
Increase in net assets attributable to investors before tax 4,873,606 805,911
Income tax expense - -
Increase in net assets attributable to investors before distribution 4,873,606 805,911
Income distribution - -
Increase in net assets attributable to investors after distribution 4,873,606 805,911
Represented by:
Income attributable to investors 2,346,528 1,194,047
Capital (loss)attributable to investors 2,527,078 (388,136)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS ATTRIBUTABLE TO INVESTORS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012
Capital attributable to Income attributable to Net assets attributable to
investors investors investors
R R R
Balance at 01 April 2011 - - -
New creation of Govi securities 37,532,955 - 37,532,955
Increase/(decrease) in net assets attributable to investors (388,136) 1,194,047 805,911
Balance at 31 March 2012 37,144,819 1,194,047 38,338,866
Increase in net assets attributable to investors 2,527,078 2,346,528 4,873,606
Balance at 31 December 2012 39,671,897 3,540,575 43,212,472
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012
Period ended Period ended
31 December 2012 31 March 2012
R R
Net cash generated from operating activities 302,077 287,150
Cash utilised from operations (347,195) (481,679)
Purchases of equity securities (9,203,927) (1,771,502)
Proceeds from sale of equity securities 7,417,030 1,323,749
Interest income 2,436,169 1,216,582
Net movement in cash and cash equivalents 302,077 287,150
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year 287,150 -
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year 589,227 287,150
NOTES TO THE SUMMARISED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ALL PORTFOLIOS (“funds”) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012
Accounting policies
1. Presentation of the financial statements
The significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the periods
presented, unless otherwise stated.
1.1 Statement of compliance
The audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), Interpretations issued by the International
Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee (IFRIC), and in the manner required by the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act of 2002 and the Trust Deed. The presentation
and disclosures of the summarised financial statements are in accordance with IAS34.
1.2 Basis of accounting and measurement
The financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting, except for cash flow information. The measurement basis used is the historical cost basis, except
where specifically indicated in the accounting policies.
1.3 Functional and presentation currency
The financial statements are presented in South African Rand, which is the Scheme's functional and presentation currency. All financial information is presented to the nearest
Rand.
1.4 Use of estimates, assumptions and judgements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting
policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in
any future periods affected. Management has determined that the underlying assumptions are appropriate and the Scheme's financial statements therefore present the financial
position fairly.
Information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgements in applying the accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts
recognised in the financial statements are included in the individual notes to the financial statements.
1.5 Financial instruments
Financial instruments are initially measured at fair value and are subsequently measured on the basis as set out below. Transaction costs of instruments carried at fair value
through profit and loss are recognised immediately through the profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive income. For other categories of financial instruments,
transaction costs (which includes incremental costs) and transaction income (i.e. initiation fees) are capitalised to the initial carrying amount.
Financial instruments are recognised on the date when the entity enters into contractual arrangements with counterparties to purchase or sell the financial instruments.
The Scheme is required to group instruments into classes that are appropriate to the nature of the information disclosed and take into account the characteristics of those financial
instruments. Classes of financial instruments have been determined by referring to the nature and extent of risks arising from the financial instruments and how these are
managed.
The Scheme generally adopts an approach of not reclassifying financial instruments between different categories subsequent to initial recognition. In exceptional circumstances,
where such reclassifications do occur, the Scheme will apply the requirements of the IAS 39 amendments for reclassifications together with the IFRS 7 required disclosures.
1.5.1 Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss
This category includes investments in portfolios and net assets attributable to investors (redeemable securities).
Financial instruments are classified in this category if they meet one or more of the criteria set out below at initial recognition, and are so designated by management. The entity
may only designate financial instruments at fair value through profit and loss when the designation results in more relevant information, as follows:
• It eliminates or significantly reduces valuation or recognition inconsistencies that would arise from measuring financial assets or
• When groups of financial assets, financial liabilities or combinations thereof are managed, and their performance evaluated, on a fair
value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy, and where information about the entity's
financial instruments is reported to management on that basis. The entity has documented risk management and investment
strategies designed to manage such assets at fair value, taking into consideration the relationship of assets to liabilities in a way that
mitigates market risks.
• The entity can also designate a financial instrument at fair value through profit or loss if it relates to a contract containing one or more
embedded derivatives that significantly modify the cash flows resulting from that contract.
The fair value designation, once made, is irrevocable. Measurement is initially at fair value, with transaction costs taken directly to the profit and loss component of the statement
of comprehensive income. Subsequent to initial recognition, the fair value is remeasured, and gains and losses from changes therein are recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income.
Interest income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income, within interest. Dividend income from financial
assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income within dividend income when the Scheme’s right to receive payments is
established.
Investment in portfolio
The Scheme comprises of thirteen portfolios.
Creation and redemption
Creation and redemption are recorded on trade date using historic cost being the previous day closing index price.
p g g p y g p
Net assets attributable to investors (redeemable securities)
All redeemable securities provided by the portfolios provide investors with the right to request redemption for cash or in specie at the value proportionate to each investor's share.
The securities are redeemable at any time at the option of the security holder and are therefore classified as financial liabilities.
1.5.2 Financial instruments at amortised cost.
The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial instruments and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant
period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts throughout the expected life of the financial instrument, or, when
appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial instrument.
The calculation includes all fees paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or
discounts.
1.5.3 Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables comprises of trade &
other receivables. Trade & other receivables includes interest income receivable and dividend receivable.
After initial measurement, loans and receivables are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less allowance for impairment. Amortised
cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees and costs that are an integral part of the effective interest rate. The interest is included in
the profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive income. The carrying amount of loans considered to be impaired on the statement of financial position is reduced
through the use of an appropriate impairment methodology. The carrying amounts approximates the fair value.
Once a loan has been written down as a result of an impairment loss, interest income is thereafter recognised using the rate of interest used to discount the future cash flows for
the purpose of measuring the impairment loss.
Cash and cash equivalents
Comprise of cash balances and call deposits with an original maturity of three months or less measured at amortised cost at reporting date. The carrying value approximates the
fair value.
1.5.4 Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost except for liabilities designated at fair value which are held at fair value through profit and loss. Financial liabilities comprise of
trade & other payables.
Trade & other payables comprise of management and trustee fee payables and are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The carrying value
approximates the fair value.
1.5.5 Impairment of financial assets at amortised cost
An impairment assessment of financial assets at amortised cost is performed at each reporting date.
Amortised cost instruments are considered to be impaired if objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of
that asset.
An impairment loss in respect of an amortised cost investment is calculated as the difference between its carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows,
discounted at the original effective interest rate.
Loans and receivables are stated net of identified and unidentified impairments.
A financial asset or group of financial assets is considered impaired if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after
the initial recognition of the asset (known as the loss event) and that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of
financial assets and can be reliably measured. In determining whether a loss event has occurred, advances are subjected to regular evaluations that take cognisance of, inter alia,
past experience of the economic climate similar to the current economic climate, overall customer risk profile and payment record and the realisable value of any collateral.
Objective evidence that a financial asset or group of assets is impaired includes observable data that comes to the attention of the entity and may include the following loss events:
• Significant financial difficulty of the issuer or borrower.
• A breach of contract, such as a default or delinquency in interest or principal payments.
• The Company granting to the borrower, for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficulty, a concession that
the lender would not otherwise consider.
• It becoming probable that the borrower will enter insolvency or other financial reorganisation.
• The disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties.
Observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a group of financial assets since the initial recognition of those assets,
although the decrease cannot yet be identified with the individual financial assets in the group, including:
- adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers in the group; or
- national or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on the assets in the group.
The entity first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually significant, and individually or collectively for financial
assets that are not individually significant. If the entity determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or
not, it includes the asset in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and collectively assesses that group for impairment. Assets that are individually
assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognised, are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.
The amount of impairment loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit
losses) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of a provision account and the amount of the
impairment loss is recognised in the profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive income. If a loan receivable or held-to-maturity investment has a variable interest
rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest rate determined under the contract.
The calculation of the present value of the estimated future cash flows of collateralised financial assets reflects the cash flows that may result from foreclosure, less costs of
obtaining and selling the collateral, whether or not foreclosure is probable.
For the purposes of a collective evaluation of impairment, financial assets are grouped on the basis of similar credit risk characteristics (i.e. on the basis of the entity’s grading
process that considers asset type, industry, geographical location, collateral type, past-due status and other relevant factors). These characteristics are relevant to the estimation
of the cash flows for groups of such assets by being indicative of the debtors’ ability to pay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the assets being evaluated.
Future cash flows for a group of financial assets that are collectively evaluated for impairment are estimated on the basis of the contractual cash flows of the assets basis of
current observable data to reflect the effects of current conditions and to remove the effects of conditions in the historical period that do not currently exist.
Estimates of changes in future cash flows for groups of assets should reflect and be directionally consistent with changes in related observable data from period to period (i.e.
changes in unemployment rates, property prices, payment status, or other factors indicative of changes in the probability of losses in the group and their magnitude). The
methodology and assumptions used for estimating future cash flows are reviewed regularly by the entity to reduce any differences between loss estimates and actual loss
experience.
Loans or other receivables, together with the associated allowance, are written off when there are no realistic prospects of future recovery and all collateral has been realised or
has been transferred to the entity.
Details of the significant estimates and judgements made by the Scheme in relation to identified and unidentified impairment are as follows:
Identified impairment
Impairment allowances are calculated on an individual basis and all relevant considerations that have a bearing on the expected future cash flows of that instrument being
assessed are taken into account, for example, the business prospects for the customer, the fair value of collateral, the Scheme’s position relative to other claimants, the reliability
of customer information and the likely cost and duration of the workout process. Subjective judgements are made in this process by management.
Furthermore, judgements change with time as new information becomes available or as workout strategies evolve, resulting in revisions to the impairment allowance as individual
decisions are taken case by case.
Once a financial asset or a group of similar financial assets have been written down as a result of an impairment loss, interest income is thereafter recognised using the rate of
interest used to discount the future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the impairment loss.
Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognised, are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.
Unidentified impairment
An impairment allowance is recognised when observable data indicates there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a group of financial assets since
the original recognition of those assets, even though the decrease cannot yet be identified for the individual assets in the group. The purpose of collective assessment of
impairment is to test for latent losses on a portfolio of loans that have not been individually evidenced.
In cases where the collective impairment of a portfolio cannot be individually evidenced, the Scheme sets out to prove that a risk condition has taken place that will result in an
impairment of assets (based on historic experience), but the losses will only be identifiable at an individual borrower level at a future date.
The emergence period concept is applied to ensure that only impairments that exist at the reporting date are captured. The emergence period is defined as the time lapse between
the occurrence of a trigger event and the impairment being identified at an individual account level.
The probability of default for each exposure class is based on historical default experience, scaled for the emergence period relevant to the exposure class. This probability of
default is then applied to the total population for which specific impairments have not been recognised.
The resulting figure represents an estimation of the impairment that occurred during the emergence period and therefore has not specifically been identified by the Scheme at the
reporting date.
The impairment allowance also takes into account the expected severity of loss at default, or the loss-given default (LGD), which is the amount outstanding when default occurs
that is not subsequently recovered. Recovery varies by product and depends, for example, on the level of security held in relation to each loan, and the Scheme’s position relative
to other claimants. The LGD estimates are based on historical default experience.
Historical loss experience is adjusted on the basis of current observable data to reflect the effects of current conditions that do not affect the period on which historical loss
experience is based and to remove the effects of conditions in the historical period that do not currently exist.
1.5.6 Derecognition of financial assets
A financial asset (or, where applicable a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognised where:
• the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have been discharged, cancelled or have expired; or
• The entity retains the rights to receive cash flows from the asset but has assumed an obligation to pay for them in full without material delay to a third
party under a pass-through arrangement; and
• the entity has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset and either:
- has transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of the asset; or
- has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
Where the entity has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset and has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset nor
transferred control of the asset, the asset is recognised to the extent of the entity’s continuing involvement in the asset. Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee
over the transferred asset is measured at the lower of the original carrying amount of the asset and the maximum amount of the consideration that the entity could be required to
repay.
Where continuing involvement takes the form of a written and/or purchased option (including a cash-settled option or similar provision) on the transferred asset, the extent of the
Scheme’s continuing involvement is the amount of the transferred asset that the Scheme may repurchase, except that in the case of a written put option (including a cash-settled
option or similar provision) on an asset measured at fair value, the extent of the Scheme’s continuing involvement is limited to the lower of the fair value of the transferred asset
and the option exercise price.
1.5.7 Derecognition of financial liabilities
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled or expires. Where an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the
same party on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified (taking into account both quantitative and qualitative factors), such an
exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is
recognised in the profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive income.
Where the terms of an existing liability are not substantially modified, the liability is not derecognised. Costs incurred on such transactions are treated as an adjustment to the
carrying amount of the liability and are amortised over the remaining term of the modified liability.
1.5.8 Fair value
The listed underlying investments are carried at fair value through profit or loss such as those designated by management under the fair value option.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or
liquidation sale.
The method of determining the fair value of financial instruments can be analysed into the following categories:
(a) Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets where the quoted price is readily available and the price represents actual and
regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis.
(b) Level 2 - Valuation techniques using market observable inputs. Such techniques may include:
- using recent arm’s length market transactions;
- reference to the current fair value of similar instruments; and
- discounted cash flow analysis, pricing models or other techniques commonly used by market participants.
(c) Level 3 - Valuation techniques, as described in (b) above, for which not all inputs are market observable prices or rates. Such a
financial instrument is initially recognised at the transaction price, which is the best indicator of fair value, although the value obtained
from the relevant valuation model may differ. The difference between the transaction price and the model value, commonly referred to
as ‘day one profit and loss’, is either amortised over the life of the transaction, deferred until the instrument's fair value can be
determined using market observable inputs, or realised through settlement.
The valuation techniques in (b) and (c) use inputs such as interest rate yield curves, equity prices, volatilities of the underlying and correlations between inputs. The models used in
these valuation techniques are calibrated against industry standards, economic models and to observed transaction prices, where available.
The best evidence of fair value at initial recognition is the transaction price (i.e. the fair value of the consideration given or received), unless the fair value of that instrument is
evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument (i.e. without modification or repackaging) or based on a valuation technique
whose variables include only data from observable markets.
All changes in fair value, other than dividend and interest income, is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a net gain/(loss) from financial instruments at fair
value through profit or loss.
1.6 Offsetting
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the statement of financial position when the entity holds a current legally enforceable right to set off the
recognised amounts and intends to either settle on a net basis, or realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
1.7 Revenue
Income comprises of interest income, coupon interest income, dividend income and scrip lending income. It is recognised to the extent that it is probable that there will be an inflow
of economic benefits and the income can be reliably measured.
Interest income is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income on a time-proportionate basis using the effective interest method and includes interest income from debt
securities.
Dividends from equity investments are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income when the shareholders’ rights to receive payment have been established except, to
the extent that dividends clearly reflect a realisation of the underlying investments.
Securities lending fee income are fees earned for the administration of securities lending activities and are accounted for on the accrual basis in the period in which the service is
rendered. Revenue from lending securities is recognised in profit or loss in proportion to the stage of completion of the transaction at the reporting date. The stage of completion is
assessed by reference to amount of scrip lent out.
1.8 Distributions
In accordance with the Scheme's Trust Deed, the price index portfolios distribute their distributable income and any other amounts determined by the management scheme to
security holders in cash.
As per the Scheme's Trust Deed, the total return index portfolios re-invest the distributions on behalf of investors through the purchase of additional Constituent Securities in the
weightings of the specific index.
1.9 Fair value gains and losses
Realised profits or losses on the disposal of investments are the differences between the fair value of the consideration received less any directly attributable costs, on the sale of
equity investments, and its carrying value at the start of the full reporting period.
Unrealised profits or losses on the revaluation of investments are the movements in the carrying value of investments between the start and end of the accounting period.
1.10 Taxation
Income is taxed in the hands of the investor if the portfolio distributes within 12 months of having received income, failing which income will be deemed to be received by and
accrued to the portfolio and will be taxed in its hands. Capital gains and losses are ultimately taxed in the investors hands on disposal of their participatory interest.
1.11 Provisions, contingent liabilities and commitments
Provisions are recognised when the Scheme has a present constructive or legal obligation as a result of past events and it is probable that an outflow of resources, embodying
economic benefits, will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate of the amount of the obligation can be made.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date. The discount rate
used to determine the present value reflects the market assessments of the time value of money and the increases specific to the liability.
Transactions are classified as contingent liabilities where the existence of the Scheme’s possible obligations depends on uncertain future events beyond the Scheme’s control or
when the Scheme has a present obligation that is not probable or which the Scheme is unable to measure reliably.
Items are classified as commitments where the Scheme commits itself to future transactions or if the items will result in the acquisition of assets.
A provision for onerous contracts is recognised when the expected benefits to be derived by the Scheme from a contract is lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its
obligation under the contract. The provision is measured at the present value of the lower of the expected cost of terminating the contract and the expected net cost of fulfilling the
contract. Before a provision is established, the Scheme recognises any impairment loss on the assets associated with that contract.
1.12 Operating Segments
The portfolios, eRAFI™ Overall, NewSA, Shariah, eRAFI™ Financial, eRAFI™ Industrial, eRAFI™ Resources, MAPPS™ Growth, MAPPS™ Protect, Swix40, TRACI 3 Month,
Equity Momentum, ILBI, GOVI, trade under the umbrella of the NewFunds Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) as separate exchange traded funds. Each of the mentioned funds
is separately listed and trades on the JSE. Thus each of the separate portfolios fall within the scope of IFRS 8: Operating Segments.
Comparative segment information has been presented in conformity with the requirements of such standards. The application of the standard only impacts the presentation and
disclosure aspect of the financial statements.
1.13 Scrip lending
Securities lent are retained in the statement of financial position when substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership remain with the Scheme. Securities will only be
repurchased when the lender defaults. This collateral (as a form of guarantee) is only deposited with the lender if required in terms of the Global Master Securities Lending
Arrangement.
2. New standards and interpretations
2.1 Standards and interpretations effective and adopted in the current period
The application of the Scheme's accounting policies are consistent with those adopted in the prior period, except for those standards and amendments listed below which became
effective in the current period, all other standards and amendments which became effective in the current year were assessed to have no impact on the financial statements.
IFRS 7 Amendments to IFRS 7 – Transfers of financial assets
This amendment is applicable to financial periods beginning on or after 1 July 2011. The amendment requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures in respect of risk
exposures arising from transferred financial assets. The amendments include a requirement to disclose by class of asset: the nature, carrying amount and a description of the risks
and rewards of financial assets that have been transferred to another party yet remain on the entity’s statement of financial position. Disclosures are also required to enable a user
to understand the amount of any associated liabilities, and the relationship between the financial assets and associated liabilities. Comparative disclosures are not required for any
period beginning before the effective date.
This amendment did not impact the financial performance or position of the scheme but has resulted in additional disclosures being provided.
2.2 Standards and interpretations not yet effective and not adopted
A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations issued are not yet effective for the current reporting period and have not been applied in preparing
these financial statements, only those standards, amendments and interpretations which were assessed to be applicable to the Schemes are disclosed below.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (IFRS 9)
This standard was initially published in November 2009 as the first step in replacing IAS 39 and contains new requirements for the classification and measurement requirements for
financial assets. The classification and measurement requirements of financial liabilities were added to IFRS 9 in October 2010. In July 2011, the International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB) communicated in an Exposure Draft its intention to postpone the mandatory application of IFRS 9 to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015 with
early application still permitted.
In light of the impairment and hedging components of IFRS 9 not being finalised, a tentative decision was reached by the IASB on 7 November 2011 to change the effective date to
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2015. The IASB decided not to require the restatement of comparative financial statements for the initial application of the classification and
measurement requirement of IFRS 9, but instead to require modified disclosures on transition from the classification and measurement requirements of IAS 39 to those of IFRS 9.
This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the Scheme's financial statements.
IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement
This standard which is applicable to financial periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013, replaces guidance on fair value measurement in existing IFRS accounting standards by
providing a single source of guidance to prescribe how fair value should be measured. The standard requires (with some exceptions) entities to classify fair value measurements
into a ‘fair value hierarchy’ based on the nature of the inputs. The standard also requires entities to make various disclosures depending on the nature and level of the fair value
measurement.
The impact of this standard is currently being assessed.
IAS 32 (amendments) (2011)
IAS 32 (amendments) (2011) Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, was issued in December 2011 and is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014.
The offsetting requirements in IAS 32 have been retained, such that a financial asset and a financial liability shall be offset and the net amount presented in the statement of
financial position when, and only when, an entity currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts, and intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise
the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The amendment to IAS 32 provides more application guidance on when the criterion for offsetting would be considered to be met.
The amended standard is applicable to financial periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014. An entity shall apply the amendments retrospectively. Earlier application is
permitted. If an entity applies these amendments from an earlier date, it shall disclose that fact and shall also make the disclosures required by Disclosures – Offsetting Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (Amendments to IFRS 7) issued in December 2011.
This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the Scheme's financial statements.
IFRS 7 (amendments) (2011)
IFRS 7 (amendments) (2011) Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, was issued in December 2011 and is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013.
The amendments require the disclosures to include information that will enable users of an entity’s financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting
arrangements, including rights of set-off associated with the entity’s recognised financial assets and recognised financial liabilities, on the entity’s financial position. These
disclosures are intended to facilitate comparison between entities preparing IFRS financial statements and entities preparing financial statements under US GAAP. An entity shall
apply these amendments for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and for interim periods within these periods. An entity shall provide the disclosures required by these
amendments retrospectively.
The adoption of this amendment is not expected to impact on the results of the Scheme, but may result in more disclosure than is currently provided in the financial statements.
Improvements project May 2012
The following improvements was issued in terms of the improvements project in May 2012. It is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and it is to be applied
retrospectively:
Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements
The adoption of this amendment is not expected to impact on the results of the Scheme, but may result in more disclosure than is currently provided in the financial statements.
3 Distributions Period ended Period ended
31 December 2012 31 March 2012
R R
50 cents per security declared 3 April 2012 and re-invested 23 May 2012. 500,000
25 cents per security declared 4 May 2012 and re-invested 19 June 2012. 250,000
29 cents per security declared 8 June 2012 and re-invested 24 July 2012. 290,000
24.62 cents per security declared 6 July 2012 and re-invested 22 August 2012. 246,270
29.58 cents per security declared 10 August 2012 and re-invested 26 September 2012. 295,843
20.80 cents per security declared 6 September 2012 and re-invested 23 October 2012. 208,097
26.67 cents per security declared 5 October 2012 and re-invested 20 November 2012. 266,720
30.50 cents per security declared 9 November 2012 and re-invested 28 December 2012. 305,020
27 cents per security declared 20 February 2012 and re-invested 20 March 2012.
270,000
2,361,950 270,000
4 Participatory Interests
Net assets due to GOVI investors relate to the Scheme’s obligation to deliver the underlying baskets of shares constituting 1 000 000 (March 2012: 1 000 000)
GOVI Index Securities listed on the Exchange traded funds sector of the JSE.
Value at date of creation/
Number of Units
Reconciliation of fair value liquidation
Opening balance – fair value 1,000,000 37,592,572
Total fair value adjustments - 2,235,412
New issues during the year - -
Redemptions during the year - -
Realised gain - 291,666
Rebalancing effect - 1,786,897
Fair value at 31 December 2012 1,000,000 41,906,547
Opening balance – fair value - -
Total fair value adjustments - - 424,961
New issues during the year 1,000,000 37,532,955
Redemptions during the year - -
Realised gain - 36,825
Rebalancing effect - 447,753
Fair value at 31 March 2012 1,000,000 37,592,572
5 Related Part Transactions
Period ended Period ended
31 December 2012 31 March 2012
Balances R R
Payable to NewFunds Proprietary Limited (9,904) (20,133)
Payable to Standard Bank (1,243) (391)
Interest income receivable from Standard Bank - 480,290
Audit report
Ernst & Young, the NewFunds Collective Investment Scheme’s independent auditor, has audited the annual financial statements of the NewFunds
Govi ETF from which the summarised results contained in this announcement have been derived, and has expressed an unmodified opinion on
the annual financial statements. Their audit report is available for inspection at the CIS’s registered office
The complete set of financial statements are available on Absa Capital’s website (www.absacapitaletfs.com).
Copies of the full announcement may be requested by emailing etf@absacapital.com
27 June 2013
Sponsor
Absa Bank Limited (acting through its Corporate and Investment Banking division)
Date: 27/06/2013 10:53:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE').
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct,
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
information disseminated through SENS.
Sharenet Sites 
