Property ETF Series Part 5: STANLIB SA Property ETF

24 April 2018 | SA Views | Mark Mayer

Over the course of this series, we have profiled four property ETFs, three domestically focused and one with an international flavour.  In this fifth week of the series, we profile the fourth and last locally focused property ETF in our list, the STANLIB SA Property ETF (STPROP).

The STANLIB SA Property ETF was launched on 13 February 2013, and thus enjoyed its 5th year anniversary two months ago. The ETF has a market capitalisation of approximately R110 million as of close of trade on the 20th April 2018.

How is the fund put together?

The objective of the STANLIB SA Property ETF is to track the SA Listed Property Index (SAPY), as closely as possible.

The fund invests in the constituents of the SA Listed Property Index and aims to replicate the index by holding the same weightings of these constituents. The SAPY is an index of the top 20 liquid property companies by market capitalisation that have a primary listing on the JSE.

The fund is rebalanced quarterly, and may also hold a small portion in cash instruments and listed derivatives to effect efficient portfolio management. The current holding in these instruments is hard to determine given that the last fact sheet available on the STANLIB website is as of end of December 2017. According to that fact sheet, 99.81% was invested in property and property-related equities. The remainder, 0.19% was invested in cash - no sign of derivative or alternative instrument exposure, at least as of December 2017.

Digging deeper elsewhere on the internet, we find a representation of the fund’s exposure on Morningstar, as of 31 March 2018. There, the split was 97.54% invested in equities and 2.46% in cash, and so again, no sign of alternative instruments being utilised in the portfolio.

During this series, reference has been made to capped and uncapped index tracking, and as far as the STANLIB SA Property ETF goes, this portfolio construction approach falls squarely into the uncapped category. As such, heavy weightings in individual stocks may persist for long periods of time. In the absence of an up-to-date fact sheet, Morningstar has indicated that as much as 22.09% was exposed to one counter, its biggest holding, Growthpoint Properties, as of 31 March 2018. The jump from December to March would have largely come from the Resilient group of companies falling so dramatically year-to-date.

Using the last published fact sheet, the top ten holdings from 31 December 2017 are as follows:


Table 1 - Top ten holdings as of 31 December 2017 (Source: STPROP December 2017 Fact Sheet)

How does this ETF differ from others?

It is one of four ETFs in our series that tracks a South African Property Index, but only one of two in our series that tracks the FTSE/JSE SAPY, without customising or capping the constituents. The other ETF is the CoreShares PropTrax SAPY (PTXSPY).

Read more about the PTXSPY ETF here: Property ETF Series Part 1: CoreShares Proptrax SAPY

The TER of the CoreShares version is 0.58%, while the STANLIB ETF is less costly at 0.37% (Annualised 3-year TER).


Table 2 - Sector weightings as at 31 December 2017 (Source: STPROP December 2017 Fact Sheet)

What type of portfolio/investor would benefit most from holding this ETF?

  • Investors who seek exposure to the South African listed property market
  • Growth-oriented portfolio looking to diversify across asset classes
  • Income-oriented portfolio focused on income growth over time
  • Portfolio looking to mimic the SAPY index and where large exposures to a few counters are not an issue
  • Portfolio exposed to physical property, looking to diversify into listed property
  • Investors who seek a low cost fund and simple investment process and mandate
  • Investors who are willing to take a longer-term view as this fund is aggressively risk profiled, and investors should expect some volatility in the shorter term

Key information


Table 4 - Key information as of 31 December 2017 (Source: STPROP December 2017 Fact Sheet)

Share price history

With over five years’ track record, those who invested within the first few months of the ETF’s launch have fared better than those who for example only invested at the start of 2018, where the fund has delivered negative 16.5% year to date (as of 20 April 2018). The merits of having a longer-term view are captured in the five-year chart below.

As we have come to expect from a passive ETF, it lags the index it tracks marginally (due to tracking error and costs). As of 31 December 2017, the portfolio had a (since inception) annualised return of 13.33% vs the benchmark, which returned a figure of 13.66%. Investment starting point is so very often a crucial part of extracting performance, and in this case, if the first three months of the 2018 year is included, the 5-year annualised figure comes to a substantially lower 3.62% return.


Source: Sharenet chart as of 23 April 2018

Click here for more information on the ETF, available via Sharenet

Also Read: CoreShares Proptrax SAPY | CoreShares Proptrax Ten | CoreShares S&P Global Property | Satrix Property




Mark Mayer
Investment Specialist at Discovery Invest

Mark graduated with a Business Science Degree from the University of Cape Town in 2007. He then joined Sharenet, during which time he also completed his B.Com Honours through UNISA. Mark has helped to build, launch and manage derivative and share trading brokerage businesses. He is also a JSE Registered Securities Trader, and has worked on the trading desk at Sharenet. After seven-and-a-half years at Sharenet Mark then moved to Reitway Global (a specialist Global Listed Property Fund Manager) where his passion for property was further kindled. Mark currently works for Discovery Invest as an Investment Specialist on their Investec Managed fund offering. He has over ten years of experience in the equity and asset management sector and can be reached at:

The views and opinions (where expressed) in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Discovery Invest.

The information contained in this article is for informational purposes only and must not be regarded as a prospectus for any security, financial product or transaction. It is neither to be construed as financial advice nor to be regarded as a definitive analysis of any financial issue. Investors should consider this research/article as only a single factor in making their investment decision. We recommend you consult a financial planner/advisor to take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation and individual needs. The views and opinions (where expressed) in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Sharenet.

Rate This Article

Your feedback is appreciated and helps us improve our content.


Thank you for helping us improve our content.

Rate This Article

Your feedback is appreciated and helps us improve our content.


Thank you for helping us improve our content.