Stock Exchange News Service

Results Of Investigation, Delay In Finalising Group Financial Results And  Further Cautionary

OCEANA GROUP LIMITED
(Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
(Registration number: 1939/001730/06)
JSE share code: OCE
NSX share code: OCG
ISIN: ZAE000025284
(“Oceana” or “the Company” or ”the Group”)

RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION, DELAY IN FINALISING GROUP FINANCIAL RESULTS AND
FURTHER CAUTIONARY

Oceana advised shareholders through a SENS announcement on 29 October 2021 of a delay in
publishing year end results. The Company was made aware of queries raised by a whistleblower
relating predominantly to the accounting treatment of matters pertaining to a United States subsidiary
of the Group together with other financial and related matters (“Matters Raised”). In particular, the
matters pertained to the accounting treatment of the Group’s 25% shareholding in Westbank Fishing
LLC (”Westbank”) held by Daybrook Fisheries Inc. (“Daybrook”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Oceana. Westbank owns fishing vessels and operates a commercial fishing business to supply
Daybrook with 100% of its catch.

    -   In order to protect the integrity of the Group’s accounting and governance processes and for
        the avoidance of doubt, Oceana took a decision to undertake a comprehensive independent
        investigation and a review process of all matters raised. Oceana appointed ENSafrica to carry
        out this task and further appointed external accounting and technical advisors to assist and
        support it in the interpretation and review of IFRS requirements, previous legal and technical
        advice obtained at the inception of the transactions in 2015 and 2018, interpretations of legal
        agreements and operational practices as well as a consideration of what the most appropriate
        accounting treatment would be, relative to previous accounting treatment applied for the 2015
        to 2020 reporting periods. The Board and the accounting advisory team also engaged with the
        Group’s previous auditors. The accounting advisory team was supported by US legal advisors
        in respect of US legal and marine regulatory matters.

        Furthermore, this review was undertaken albeit that the US acquisition transaction in 2015 was
        specifically designed and structured, both in 2015 and subsequently in 2018, in a way that
        complies with US marine law regulations pertaining to US citizen control of the fishing vessels.
        These transactions were designed after factoring in the advice of both SA and US legal advisors
        as well as US marine law advisors and was approved by shareholders in compliance with the
        JSE Listings Requirements. An accounting technical opinion on the IFRS implications was
        obtained at the same time and this informed and confirmed the basis of accounting since 2015.
        At the time the Board constituted a committee of non-executive directors to have oversight over
        the transaction and interacted with the advisors directly in addressing both governance and
        scrutiny over specific transaction matters. The 2018 negotiations were led by a senior member
        of management, supported by the advisors referred to above, under the direct oversight of a
        committee of non-executive directors given the related party aspects of the transaction. The
        final transaction and operating agreements were submitted for approval to the US marine
        regulator as well as other regulators. Westbank’s fishing endorsements were approved on
        commencement of the transaction and have been renewed every year since. Through
        undertaking this current review, the Board was also intent on understanding and assessing any
        potential risk a revised accounting treatment may have on the US marine regulator’s
        assessment of compliance with its regulations.

        The investigation and analyses have been concluded and the Board confirms the following:

    -   There has been no evidence of fraud, misappropriation or loss of funds or management
        override of controls arising from any of the Matters Raised.
    -   As a result of the analyses, the accounting treatment of various matters relating to Daybrook
        and its investment in Westbank has come under review.

-   Arising out of this review, Oceana’s technical accounting advisors, Mazars South Africa
    supported by Mazars International amongst others, concluded that a purely legal interpretation
    of certain clauses in the transaction, shareholders’ and operating agreements could result in a
    conclusion, from an IFRS perspective, that Oceana has joint control over Westbank. However,
    considering that voting against the 75% shareholder in Westbank could result, ultimately, in
    Westbank losing its fishing endorsement and thus significantly prejudicing the operations of
    Daybrook, the technical advisors concluded that because there is a significant economic
    disincentive for Daybrook to exercise joint control, and that in fact Daybrook has not been
    exercising its veto rights over the operational expenditure budget, the 75% shareholder has de
    facto control over Westbank and that Daybrook only has significant influence which is aligned
    with the accounting treatment in prior years.
-   The conclusion of the auditors is that while the purpose and design of the structure together
    with a number of special relationship indicators could point to Daybrook having control over
    Westbank, a level of judgement is introduced by virtue of legal interpretation concluding that
    Daybrook cannot unilaterally remove the 75% shareholder. Further, the auditors concluded
    that Daybrook’s rights, via supermajority decision making clauses and arbitration clauses in the
    operating agreement, are substantive and that Daybrook has joint control over Westbank with
    the arrangement being classified as a joint operation from an IFRS perspective. This conclusion
    results in a change in the accounting treatment from equity accounting 25% of the holding to
    accounting for 100% of Westbank based on the share of the output which Daybrook is obliged
    to take from Westbank and recognising a liability in respect of the 75% shareholder’s share of
    the profit/loss and net assets to which Daybrook is not entitled.
-   This change to proportionate consolidation resulted in a change to the prior year’s comparative
    numbers but has had no change to headline earnings per share, earnings per share or net
    asset value per share. The Group’s 25% share in Westbank contributed an approximate loss
    of less than 1% of the Group’s profit before tax for the year ended 30 September 2021.
-   The accounting treatment of a $3.5m asset on the Group’s balance sheet in respect of
    Westbank, which arose prior to the new shareholder taking ownership in 2018. This has also
    come under review. Specifically, the discussions covered whether the amount should be in the
    cost of investment in an associate, goodwill or written off. The technical accounting team also
    considered these matters. The final accounting treatment has been an increase in goodwill of
    $4.4m and a reallocation of $3.5m from current assets to goodwill.
-   Oceana has initiated a process with the 75% shareholder in Westbank to give effect to the
    original intent of the transaction to have no more than significant influence by clarifying to the
    extent necessary clauses in the agreements that could be interpreted to give Oceana joint
    control over Westbank. This process will, to the extent applicable, be subject to all regulatory
    processes and approvals.

-   Further issues that were investigated in the Matters Raised included:

    -   The appropriateness of recognition in Daybrook’s books of the proceeds of an insurance
        payment received under a self-insurance arrangement in which Oceana participates. This
        was found to have been appropriately accounted for.
    -   Conflicts of interest arising from relationships within the workplace. Remedial action is
        being undertaken in one instance in this regard.
    -   Related party transactions involving the purchase by Oceana of COVID-19 related supplies
        (masks and rapid test kits) from suppliers associated to Brimstone. It was found that no
        undue influence in the procurement process was established, the procurement policy and
        supplier screening processes were applied and there was a valid rationale for the
        purchases. The value of the purchases was also not material.
    -   Nevertheless, some improvements to the procurement policy have been recommended.
    -   Possible undue influence in proposed changes to be made to the remuneration
        incentives for management employees, which changes entail the proposed acceleration of
        the vesting of incentives. This was found to have no substance.
    -   Further matters that the Board has or is taking action on relate to management style, culture
        and the governance over reporting and managing conflicts in certain areas within the
        organisation. Whilst these instances are isolated and not prevalent throughout the organisation,
        the Board views these matters in an extremely serious light and has initiated remedial action in
        regard thereto.
    -   Other matters, that were not within the original scope of the investigation, came to the Board’s
        attention during the course of the investigation and may potentially lead to further remedial
        action and possible reportable irregularities relating to conduct and behavioural breaches of
        key personnel.

The principal aspects of the investigation were completed by ENSafrica towards the end of December
2021 and the report has been subject to external review by the Group’s auditors, with particular
reference to the IFRS interpretations and the resultant basis of accounting for the 25% interest in
Westbank. The Board is advised that the audit is substantially complete, however the auditors require
more time of approximately 10 days in which to finalise their conclusions and the results will be released
thereafter. The change in basis of accounting for Westbank, which has been a key focus area, has had
no impact on headline earnings or on net asset value for the current year and in this regard the attention
of shareholders is drawn to the voluntary trading update published by the Group on 10 December 2021.

The Board has the highest regard for its governance, regulatory and reporting responsibilities and is
extremely disappointed to advise that it is not in a position to release condensed reviewed results on
the communicated date of 31 January 2022 until the external audit review is completed within the
estimated 10 days from date of this announcement. The Company and auditors have engaged with the
JSE regarding the delay and to confirm to the JSE their commitment to release condensed reviewed
results within the timeframe indicated. Shareholders are thus requested to exercise caution when
dealing in the Group’s shares until such time as the Group’s condensed results are released as
indicated above.

Cape Town
31 January 2022


Sponsor - South Africa
The Standard Bank of South Africa Limited


Sponsor – Namibia
Old Mutual Investment Services (Namibia) Proprietary Limited

Date: 31-01-2022 03:12:00

Supplied by www.sharenet.co.za
Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.