To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

TSOGO SUN HOLDINGS LIMITED - Proposed Disposal to Hospitality Property Fund Limited, Unbundling and Cautionary Announcement

Release Date: 02/03/2018 17:00
Code(s): TSH     PDF:  
Wrap Text
Proposed Disposal to Hospitality Property Fund Limited, Unbundling and Cautionary Announcement

 TSOGO SUN HOLDINGS LIMITED
 (Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
 (Registration No. 1989/002108/06)
 JSE Share Code: TSH
 ISIN: ZAE000156238
 ("Tsogo")




 PROPOSED DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN TSOGO CASINO, HOTEL AND OFFICE PROPERTIES
 TO HOSPITALITY PROPERTY FUND LIMITED ("HPF"), THE UNBUNDLING OF TSOGO’S
 ENTIRE INTEREST IN HPF AND CAUTIONARY ANNOUNCEMENT



1.      Introduction

             Shareholders of Tsogo are advised that the boards of directors of Tsogo and HPF
             have agreed, in principle, to the acquisition by HPF of certain of the casino precinct
             properties ("Properties"), currently owned by the Tsogo group of companies (“Tsogo
             Group”), in consideration for the issue by HPF of new shares in HPF ("Proposed
             Transaction").

             The Properties are the following:

1.2.1              Montecasino Precinct: Montecasino, Palazzo, Southern Sun Montecasino,
                   SunSquare Montecasino, Palazzo Towers East & West Offices and The Pivot
                   Offices;

1.2.2              Gold Reef City Casino Precinct: Gold Reef City Casino and Southern Sun
                   Gold Reef City;

1.2.3              Silverstar Casino Precinct: Silverstar Casino and Southern Sun Silverstar;

1.2.4              Suncoast Casino Precinct:         Suncoast Casino, Suncoast Towers and
                   SunSquare Suncoast;

1.2.5              Blackrock Casino Precinct: Blackrock Casino and Garden Court Blackrock;

1.2.6              Emnotweni Casino Precinct: Emnotweni Casino, Southern Sun Emnotweni
                   and StayEasy Emnotweni; and

1.2.7              The Ridge Casino Precinct: The Ridge Casino, Southern Sun The Ridge and
                   StayEasy Emalahleni.

2.      Broad Outline of the Proposed Transaction

        It is contemplated that:

              the Tsogo Group will undertake an internal group restructuring pursuant to which the
              Properties will become owned by an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Tsogo
              ("PropCo");

              the Properties will be let to an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Tsogo ("LeaseCo"),
              in terms of a head lease;

              the salient terms of the head lease will be:

2.3.1               the head lease will be concluded between PropCo ("Landlord") and LeaseCo
                    ("Tenant");

2.3.2               the head lease will permit the Tenant to sub-let each of the Properties in terms
                    of separate sub-leases to various Tsogo Group operating companies;

2.3.3               the head lease will be concluded for an initial period enduring until 31 March
                    2023, whereafter the head lease can be terminated by either party on 15 years’
                    written notice;

2.3.4               the initial aggregate base rental payable by the Tenant for the Properties will be
                    R1.9 billion per annum, which is approximately 65% of the aggregate casino
                    precinct EBITDAR (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation amortisation and
                    rent) in the first year of the head lease, post-management and license fees, in
                    respect of all the Properties, one twelfth of which amount will be payable monthly
                    in advance on the 1st business day of each month;

2.3.5               the initial aggregate base rental will escalate annually on the 1st day of April of
                    each year by the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), subject to the terms of an
                    Anniversary Rental Review referred to in paragraph 2.3.6 below;

2.3.6               on the 7th anniversary of 1 April 2018 and thereafter on each further 5th
                    anniversary of that date, the aggregate annual rental payable by the Tenant in
                    respect of the Properties for the year commencing on such anniversary, will be
                    reviewed ("Anniversary Rental Review") and be recalculated to reflect the
                    lesser of:
              an amount equal to the aggregate annual rental that was paid in respect
              of the Properties for the year terminating on the day preceding such
              anniversary, escalated at the rate of CPI; and

              an amount equal to 70% of the EBITDAR earned by the Properties in
              respect of the year terminating on the day preceding such anniversary
              (“Re-set”), escalated at the rate of CPI;

        provided that a downward Re-set will not be applied, and the aggregate annual
        rental payable by the Tenant in respect of the Properties for the year
        commencing on the 7th anniversary or any subsequent 5th anniversary (as the
        case may be) will be the amount calculated in terms of paragraph 2.3.6.1, in
        circumstances where the difference between the amount calculated in terms of
        paragraph 2.3.6.1 above and the amount calculated in terms of paragraph
        2.3.6.2 above does not exceed an amount of two point five percent of the
        amount calculated in terms of paragraph 2.3.6.1.

2.3.7   where there has been a downward Re-set to the aggregate annual rental
        payable as contemplated in paragraph 2.3.6.2 above as a result of any
        Anniversary Rental Review (a “Downward Re-set”), then:

              in applying the Anniversary Rental Review calculation contained in
              paragraph 2.3.6 above in respect of the following Anniversary Rental
              Review, the amount to be used in respect of paragraph 2.3.6.1 will be the
              amount that the CPI escalated annual aggregate rental, would have been,
              had there been no downward Re-set and this will be compared to the
              amount calculated in terms of paragraph 2.3.6.2 as provided for in
              paragraph 2.3.6; and

              the annual rental payable in each of the respective years commencing on
              the first and on the second anniversary dates of that Downward Re-set
              occurring shall again be reviewed in accordance with paragraph 2.3.6,
              with the preceding year’s EBITDAR used for purposes of paragraph
              2.3.6.2 and the Re-set only to be effected if it is an upward Re-set.

2.3.8   subject to the provisions of paragraph 2.3.9 below, in the event of a downward
        Re-set occurring in any two consecutive Anniversary Rental Review cycles of
        the head lease, the Landlord will be entitled, either:

              to give 5 years’ written notice of termination of the head lease in its
               entirety, effective from the end of the second of such Anniversary Rental
               Review cycles; or

               to give 5 years’ written notice of termination of the head lease in respect
               only of the casino precinct Properties whose performance was the cause
               of the second Downward Re-set concerned, effective from the end of the
               second of such Anniversary Rental Review cycles;

         provided, however, that any such notice must be received by the Tenant within
         a period of 3 months of the end of the second of such Anniversary Rental
         Review cycles in order to constitute a valid notice of termination;

2.3.9    notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 2.3.7 and 2.3.8 above, the Tenant
         will have the right to waive any Downward Re-set in respect of any Anniversary
         Rental Review cycle of the head lease, thereby preventing an early termination
         of the head lease as contemplated in paragraph 2.3.8 above should it elect to
         make (and make) payment of an aggregate annual rental which is equal to the
         aggregate annual rental that was paid in respect of the Properties for the year
         terminating on the day preceding the day upon which the Downward Re-set
         would have been implemented, escalated at the rate of CPI, instead of making
         payment of the Downward Re-set amount that would have been implemented
         for the year commencing on such anniversary, continuing to escalate thereafter
         in terms of paragraph 2.3.5;

2.3.10   the head lease will be a triple net lease;

2.3.11   the Tenant will be liable for all utility deposits and charges incurred or payable
         in respect of the Properties;

2.3.12   the Tenant (or its nominee) may, at its own cost, make any alterations,
         renovations or additions to any of the developments on any of the Properties,
         and may install any fixtures, fittings and equipment without the Landlord’s
         consent;

2.3.13   where such alterations or additions to any of the Properties constitutes material
         improvements of such casino precinct Property, the Tenant (or its nominee) may
         elect to offer the sale of that development opportunity to the Landlord and its
         lease-back. In the event that the Landlord does not acquire the development
         opportunity and the sale and lease-back, then the Tenant (or its nominee) will
                be free to erect those improvements at its cost and to restore such casino
                precinct Property to its original condition at the end of the head lease;

2.3.14          subject to the aforesaid, all improvements will be forfeited to the Landlord for no
                consideration on termination of the head lease. The Tenant (or its nominee) will
                be entitled to remove all fixtures, fittings and equipment upon termination of the
                head lease;

2.3.15          the Tenant will be entitled to sublet the Properties and/or any portion/s thereof,
                or grant concessions for such premises (including any improvements, or part
                thereof) without the consent of the Landlord; and

2.3.16          the Landlord will grant the Tenant a right of first refusal to acquire each of the
                Properties of which the Landlord wishes to dispose.

          The Tsogo Group will dispose of its shares in PropCo to HPF in terms of an asset-for-
          share transaction in terms of Section 42 of the Income Tax Act, 1962, as amended
          ("Income Tax Act"), in exchange for new shares in HPF. Such HPF shares will be
          transferred to Tsogo in terms of an intra-group transaction in terms of Section 45 of
          the Income Tax Act.

          Tsogo intends, thereafter, to distribute its entire shareholding in HPF to Tsogo's
          shareholders, in terms of an unbundling transaction in terms of Section 46 of the
          Income Tax Act ("Unbundling"), subject to the requisite shareholder approvals being
          obtained in terms of Sections 112 and 115(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2008, as
          amended ("Companies Act").

          Following implementation of the Proposed Transaction, it is intended that the Tsogo
          Group will maintain its debt to EBITDA ratio at a level which does not exceed 3.5 and
          the Tsogo Group will be required to obtain the consent of HPF should it wish to exceed
          this level, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

3.   Rationale for undertaking the Proposed Transaction

          By restructuring the Tsogo Group into a propco (HPF) and opco (Tsogo), shareholders
          who are historically gaming and hotel investors and who want exposure to the
          respective business models and cyclical nature of the businesses, will be able to
          diversify their holdings accordingly.

          Post the implementation of the Proposed Transaction and the Unbundling, Tsogo
          shareholders will hold:
3.2.1              HPF shares which will provide stable and predictable distributions in line with
                   inflation; and

3.2.2              Tsogo shares which are more exposed to the risks and opportunities of the
                   gaming industry and the South African macro-economic climate.

             The overall result being that on a sum-of-parts valuation, the Tsogo (opco) share plus
             the HPF (propco) share is anticipated to be worth more than a Tsogo share is currently
             worth, unlocking value for Tsogo shareholders.

4.      Conditions Precedent to the Proposed Transaction

             The Proposed Transaction is subject to, inter alia, a formal written agreement being
             concluded between the relevant companies in the Tsogo Group and HPF, upon terms
             acceptable to Tsogo and HPF ("Agreement"). Such Agreement will be subject to the
             normal terms for transactions of the nature of the Proposed Transaction and otherwise
             as may be agreed between Tsogo and HPF.

             The Agreement, itself, will be subject to the fulfilment (or waiver) of certain conditions
             precedent, including, without limitation:

4.2.1              HPF undertaking a due diligence investigation of the Properties and being
                   satisfied with the results of such investigation;

4.2.2              the obtaining, on terms acceptable to Tsogo and HPF, of all requisite regulatory
                   and other consents and shareholder approvals;

4.2.3              the sub-committee of independent directors of the HPF board of directors ("HPF
                   Board"), as established by the HPF Board, approving of the terms of the
                   Agreement;

4.2.4              the board of directors of Tsogo approving the terms of the Agreement;

4.2.5              the obtaining of the requisite independent expert opinions in terms of the
                   Companies Act and the Listings Requirements of the JSE Limited ("Listings
                   Requirements"); and

4.2.6              such other conditions precedent as may be agreed between Tsogo and HPF.

5.      HPF Consideration Shares

        Based on an equity valuation of PropCo of R15 billion (being the value of the PropCo
     property portfolio of R23 billion net of PropCo debt of R8 billion), the number of HPF
     consideration shares to be issued to the Tsogo Group will be approximately 1.2 billion at an
     issue price of R12.50 per share. This will result in Tsogo's total shareholding in HPF being
     approximately 1.5 billion HPF shares (approximately 87% of HPF’s total issued share
     capital, net of treasury shares), which shareholding Tsogo intends to distribute to its
     shareholders in terms of the Unbundling.

6.   Classification of the Proposed Transaction

     The Proposed Transaction will be classified as a Category 1 Transaction and a Related Party
     Transaction for Tsogo in terms of the Listings Requirements and will require the approval of
     shareholders.

7.   Forward-looking Information and Statements

     Shareholders are advised that any forward-looking information or statements contained in
     this announcement have not been reviewed or reported on by Tsogo's independent auditors.

8.   Further Details of the Proposed Transaction and Cautionary Announcement

     The full details of the Proposed Transaction will be provided to shareholders once the
     Agreement has been finalised and signed. Accordingly, shareholders should exercise
     caution when dealing in Tsogo shares until a further announcement is made.




2 March 2018




 Corporate advisor and transaction
 sponsor to Tsogo
 Investec Bank Limited

 Corporate Law Advisor to Tsogo
 Taback and Associates Proprietary Limited

Date: 02/03/2018 05:00:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.

Share This Story