To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

FERRUM CRESCENT LIMITED - Lead-Zinc Drill Programme Assay Results - Toral Project, Spain

Release Date: 07/09/2017 08:00
Code(s): FCR     PDF:  
Wrap Text
Lead-Zinc Drill Programme Assay Results - Toral Project, Spain

FERRUM CRESCENT LIMITED
(Incorporated and registered in Australia and registered as an external company
in the Republic of South Africa)
(Registration number A.C.N. 097 532 137)
(External company registration number 2011/116305/10)
Share code on the ASX: FCR
Share code on AIM: FCR
Share code on the JSE: FCR
Australian ISIN: AU000000WRL8
South African ISIN: AU000000FCR2

7 September 2017

                              Ferrum Crescent Limited
                       (“FCR” or the “Company”)(ASX, AIM, JSE: FCR)

             Lead-Zinc Drill Programme Assay Results - Toral Project, Spain


FCR, the lead-zinc exploration company, is pleased to announce the assay results from its
recent 6 hole - 1,046.9 metres exploration drill programme at its wholly owned Toral Project,
located in the province of Leon, Spain, which has returned a series of high-grade lead-zinc
intersections. The drilling campaign was designed to determine the presence of lead-zinc in
an area that is approximately three hundred metres above the deep Toral Deposit, which was
historically explored by third parties, and which is the subject of a foreign estimate for the
purpose of the ASX Listing Rules, comprising an NI 43-101 compliant Indicated foreign mineral
resource estimate (further details of which were set out in the Company’s announcement of
10 November 2016).

These new drilling results confirm lead-zinc intersections in all six holes, as previously reported
from visual inspection in the Company’s announcement of 28 July 2017, with significant high
grade lead-zinc intersections in three of the six holes.


Highlights

- All of the 1,046.9m drilled occurred within 200 metres of the surface.
- Intersection of lead-zinc anomalies in all six drill holes.
- Key intersections encountered (all widths given along the core):
  - Hole TOR17009 1 metre grading at 1.22%Pb, 9.77%Zn (10.99% combined Pb/Zn);
  - Hole TOR17012 3 metres grading at 0.64%Pb, 6.46%Zn (7.10% combined Pb/Zn);
  - Hole TOR17012 1 metre grading at 0.67%Pb, 16.10%Zn (16.77% combined Pb/Zn);
  - Hole TOR17013 1 metre grading at 6.51%Pb, 6.50%Zn (13.01% combined Pb/Zn); and
  - Hole TOR17013 3 metres grading at 6.03%Pb, 5.49%Zn (11.52% combined Pb/Zn).

Intended further exploration activities
- Incorporate all of the new assay data into the Company’s geological model so as to
  integrate the lead-zinc mineralisation found towards the surface of the deposit.
- Develop and execute the second phase drilling campaign to corroborate the high grade
  lead-zinc results from historic drilling.
- Aim to define a JORC (2012) compliant resource estimate based on the updated, revised
  geological model combined with the 44 kilometres of historic drilling performed by third
  parties, for relatively limited expenditure.

Drilling Programme
- As reported in the Company’s announcement of 28 July 2017, a drilling campaign of six
  holes drilled across various elevations was recently conducted at the Toral Project. A total
  of 1,046.9 metres was drilled.
- Refer to Appendix A for further information.

Drilling results
- Drillholes labelled TOR17009, 17012 and 17013 returned the highest assay results. The
  significant intercepts are set out in Appendix B.
- Drillholes labelled TOR17008, 17010 and 17011 also intersected lead-zinc but no
  significant grades (above 5% combined) were detected.
- Refer to Appendix B for further information (note that all measurements are given along the
  core).



Justin Tooth, Executive Chairman of FCR, said:
“These assay results, showing high-grade ore intersections of combined lead-zinc including
grades above 10% within 200 metres of surface, are a most positive outcome for the
Company. The assays significantly add to our earlier modelling on Toral by identifying lead-
zinc mineralisation in a near-surface zone that is approximately three hundred metres above
the historically explored Toral Deposit. The Toral Deposit is the subject of a foreign estimate
for the purpose of the ASX Listing Rules, comprising an NI 43-101 compliant Indicated foreign
mineral resource, details of which were set out in the Company’s announcement of 10
November 2016. Our initial objective was to determine the presence of lead-zinc towards the
surface in order to progress our new geological model; however, these strong results may
open up other avenues for the project’s development. The highest grade intersections (shown
in the drilling results set out in Appendix B) of up to 16.1% zinc and up to 18.4% combined
lead-zinc are highly supportive of our exploration programme.

“FCR will now utilise these latest results and the extensive database from the 44 kilometres of
historic drilling in order to enhance its understanding of the geology of the Toral Project and
refine its intended further exploration activities. This should enable the Company to work
towards defining a JORC 2012 compliant resource estimate, in order to ascertain and evaluate
the real potential for future mining at Toral, against the current backdrop of a strong zinc
market.”

Competent person’s statement

The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results is based on
information compiled by Mr Juki Laurikko who is a Member of the European Federation of
Geologists which is a Recognised Professional Organisation for the purposes of the 2012
JORC Code. Mr Laurikko is a Technical Consultant to the Company, and has sufficient
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as
defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results,
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Laurikko consents to the inclusion in this
announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they
appear. Mr Laurikko has also reviewed and approved the technical information in his capacity
as a qualified person under the AIM Rules.


For further information on the Company, please visit www.ferrumcrescent.com or contact:

Ferrum Crescent Limited
Justin Tooth, Executive Chairman
Grant Button, Director and Company Secretary
T: +61 8 9474 2995
UK enquiries:
Laurence Read (UK representative)
T: +44 7557 672 432

Strand Hanson Limited (Nominated Adviser)
Rory Murphy/Matthew Chandler
T: +44 (0)20 7409 3494

Beaufort Securities Limited (Broker)
Elliot Hance
T: +44 (0)20 7382 8300

Bravura Capital (Pty) Ltd (JSE Sponsor)
Melanie De Nysschen
T (direct): +27 11 459 5052

The information contained within this announcement is deemed by the Company to constitute inside
information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014.
                Appendix A: Table 1 Appendix 5A ASX Listing Rules (JORC Code)

                      Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data, Toral Project

Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data, Diamond Drilling, Toral Project
 Criteria        Explanation                           Comments
 Sampling
                 Nature and quality of sampling
 techniques                                        Diamond drilling
                 (e.g. cut channels, random chips,
                 or specific specialised industry
                 standard measurement tools
                 appropriate to the minerals
                 under investigation, such as
                 down hole gamma sondes, or
                 handheld XRF instruments, etc.).
                 These examples should not be
                 taken as limiting the broad
                 meaning of sampling.

                 Include reference to measures
                                                      Spacing variable due to location of existing access roads and suitable terrain.
                 taken to ensure sample
                 representivity and the
                 appropriate calibration of any
                 measurement tools or systems
                 used.
                 Aspects of the determination of
                 mineralisation that are Material      Drill hole locations were set out with high definition GPS,
                 to the Public Report. In cases        GEOMAX Zenith 35.
                 where
                 ‘industry standard’ work has          Drill core was split in half and 1 metre samples, or shorter due
                 been done this would be relatively    to lithological contacts, were packed and labelled into plastic
                 simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation     bags.
                 drilling
                 was used to obtain 1 m samples        Sample preparation was done at ALS Chemex in Spain and assayed for multi-
                 from which 3 kg was pulverised        element analysis, ME ICP 41 (35 element). Samples with over 1% of mineralisation
                 to produce a 30 g charge for fire     were re-assayed using ME OG46.
                 assay’). In other cases more
                 explanation may be required,
                 such as where there is coarse
                 gold that has inherent sampling
                 problems. Unusual commodities
                 or mineralisation types (e.g.
                 submarine nodules) may
                 warrant disclosure of detailed
                 information.

 Drilling        Drill type (e.g. core, reverse
 techniques      circulation, open?hole hammer,       Diamond drilling was conducted using a wireline rig, mounted on a crawler. Drill bit
                 rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,    sizes PQ and PQ3 were used and when the hole was expected to intersect
                 sonic, etc.) and details (e.g. core mineralised zone, the core was recovered with a triple core barrel.
                 diameter, triple or standard tube,
                 depth of diamond tails, face?
                 sampling bit or other type,
                 whether core is oriented and if so,
                 by what method, etc.).

 Drill sample
 recovery
                 Method of recording and
                                                       Drill core was assembled in the core boxes and the real length of the drill run was
                 assessing core and chip sample
                                                       measured with measuring tape to be able to calculate the core recovery.
                 recoveries and results assessed.
               Measures       taken   to
                                                       Use of triple core barrel when intersecting expected mineralised zones.
               maximize sample recovery
               and ensure representative
               nature of the samples.
               Whether a relationship exists
               between sample recovery and
               grade and whether sample bias
               may have occurred due to                Not applicable at this stage
               preferential loss/gain of
               fine/coarse material.
Logging         Whether core and chip samples
                have been geologically and
                geotechnically logged to a level of   Drill logs digitally entered into the Company´s standard templates.
                detail to support appropriate         Logging is of sufficient quality to support Mineral resource estimation, however at
                Mineral Resource estimation,          this stage (Company´s first six drill holes comprising 1,046m) the
                                                      lithological/alteration and mineralogical features assisting modelling of the Mineral
               mining studies and metallurgical
                                                      Resource are yet to be determined.
              studies.

               Whether logging is qualitative or
               quantitative in nature. Core (or  Quantitative logging of colour, grain size, weathering, structural fabric, lithology,
               costean, channel, etc.)           alteration type and sulfide mineralisation documented.
               photography
               The total length and percentage of
               the relevant intersections logged. All drill holes are logged using visual inspection. Information captured on paper
                                                  sheets and entered into company´s logging template.


Sub-           If core, whether cut or sawn and
sampling       whether quarter, half or all core      Mineralised zones of the core are split; one half core is sent for assaying and the
techniques     taken.                                 second is stored in the core box as a reference.
and sample
preparation
               If non-core, whether riffled, tube
               sampled, rotary split, etc. and        Not applicable as entire sample is core.
               whether sampled wet or dry.


               For all sample types, the nature,  Sample preparation was done at ALS Chemex in Spain, using standard preparation
               quality and appropriateness of the technique suitable for multi-element analysis, ME ICP 41 (35 element). Samples
               sample preparation technique.      with over 1% of ore grade were re-assayed using ME OG46.


               Quality control procedures
               adopted for all sub-sampling      Standard, blanks, field samples and repeats (using also coarse split and pulp reject)
               stages to maximise representivity were inserted into the sample stream.
               of samples.
               Measures taken to ensure that the Field duplicate (quarter core) samples were collected at 2 in 100 samples,
               sampling is representative of the inas a rotating blank, standard, field duplicate and repeat sequence.
               situ material collected, including
               for instance results for field
               duplicate/second?half sampling.


               Whether sample sizes are
               appropriate to the grain size of the Samples are of 1 metre length or smaller (lithological contacts) or a quarter core
               material being sampled.             (field sample). Grain size of all samples are from medium to fine-grained.


Quality of     The nature, quality and
assay data     appropriateness of the assaying         Assays were carried out by ALS Chemex in Spain, using standard preparation
and            and laboratory procedures used          techniques suitable for multi-element analysis, ME ICP 41 (35 element). Samples
laboratory     and whether the technique is            with over 1% of ore grade were re-assayed using ME OG46.
tests          considered partial or total.
                For geophysical tools,             Not applicable as no geophysical tools were used in this programme.
                spectrometers, handheld XRF
                instruments, etc., the parameters
                used in determining the analysis
                including instrument make and
                model, reading times, calibrations
                factors applied and their
                derivation, etc.

               Nature of quality control procedures The Company uses certified reference materials (CRM) and field duplicates in its
               adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,       QA/QC procedures. CRMs are sourced from
               duplicates, external laboratory        Labmix24 and 6 standards were inserted every 15 samples. Field Duplicate samples
               checks) and whether acceptable         were taken at a nominal frequency of 2 in 100 samples. QA/QC also includes regularly
               levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) inserted Pulp Blanks, 2 Coarse Blanks, 2 Pulp Repeats and 2 Coarse Repeats in every
                                                      100 samples. No samples. No samples sent yet to external laboratory.
               and precision have been                No bias has been observed and accuracy/precision is believed to be acceptable for
               established.                           quoting Exploration Results.


Verification    The verification of significant
of sampling     intersections by either independent
and             or alternative company personnel. No such verification conducted in respect of this announcement.
assaying
                The use of twinned holes.          No twinned holes.




                Documentation of primary data, Primary data was collected using the Company´s set of standard digital templates.
                data entry procedures, data
                verification, data storage (physical
                and electronic) protocols



                Discuss any adjustment to assay    No adjustment to assay data has been carried out.
                data.


Location of     Accuracy and quality of surveys    Drill hole locations were set out with high definition GPS,
data points     used to locate drill holes (collar GEOMAX Zenith 35 and down-hole deviation measures were
                and down?hole surveys), trenches, carried out by the drilling contractor using Maxibor equipment.
                mine workings and other locations
                used in Mineral Resource
                estimation.


                Specification of the grid system
                used.                              Co-ordinates are presented in ETRS89 Zone 29.




                Quality and adequacy of            Topographic control is based on published 1:5,000 topographic sheets for the region.
                topographic control.
Data         Data spacing for reporting of          Drill hole spacing varies from 30m to 60m and was selected to use existing access
spacing       Exploration Results.                 roads and to test continuation of the mineralisation documented in the old adits.
and
distribution Whether the data spacing and
              distribution is sufficient to
              establish the degree of geological   The mineralized domains have not yet been explored sufficiently to demonstrate the
              and grade continuity appropriate     continuity of the mineralized structures to support a definition of Mineral Resource.
              for the Mineral Resource and Ore
              Reserve estimation procedure(s)
              and


               Whether sample compositing has No compositing has been applied yet to the exploration results.
               been applied




Orientation    Whether the orientation of the     The orientation of the mineralised structures has not yet been ascertained and
of data in     samples achieves unbiased          drilling has been oriented perpendicular to the interpreted structure of the
relation to    sampling of possible structures    mineralisation (observations from the old surface workings and adits).
geological     and extent to which this is known,
structure      considering the deposit type,



               If the relationship between the    No orientation based sampling bias has been identified in the data at this stage.
               drilling orientation and the
               orientation of key mineralized
               structures is considered to have
               introduced a sampling bias, this
               should be assessed and reported if
               material


Sample         The measures taken to ensure        All samples were logged and checked on return from the field.
Security       sample security.                    All samples were then stored in a secure building before being dispatched to the
                                                   laboratory via a reputable transport company.
Audits or      The results of any audits or reviews No audits or reviews have been carried out at this stage.
reviews        of sampling techniques and data.
                   Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results, Toral Project

Criteria             JORC Code explanation                             Commentary

Mineral tenement     - Type, reference name/number, location           - The Toral zinc-lead permit is located near
and land tenure        and ownership including agreements or             Ponferrada in the west of the province of
status                 material issues with third parties such as        Leon, Autonomous Community of Castile
                       joint ventures, partnerships, overriding          and Leon, Spain approximately 400 km
                       royalties, native title interests, historical     northwest of Madrid.
                       sites, wilderness or national park and          - The project is a licence covering 20 km2.
                       environmental settings.                         - There are no known impediments to the
                                                                         licence security.
                     - The security of the tenure held at the time
                       of reporting along with any known
                       impediments to obtaining a licence to
                       operate in the area.
Exploration done     - Acknowledgment and appraisal of                -   Between 1975 and 1985, the
by other parties       exploration by other parties.                      Adaro/Peñarroya joint venture carried
                                                                          out exploration on the four separate
                                                                          licences which now correspond,
                                                                          approximately, to the Toral permit area.
                                                                          Over a period of nine years, a
                                                                          topographical survey, geological
                                                                          mapping, a hydrogeological study and
                                                                          more than 40,000m of diamond drilling
                                                                          (62 holes and 41 wedges) were carried
                                                                          out.
                                                                       - Lundin Mining S.L. (Lundin) acquired the
                                                                         Toral investigation permit no. 15.199 in
                                                                         2007 and commenced exploration in April
                                                                         2007. Lundin compiled the information
                                                                         collected by the previous licence holders
                                                                         including: o a review of the available
                                                                         geological maps, plans, sections and
                                                                         assays; o surveying old workings, old drill
                                                                         pads, and drill hole locations; and, a study
                                                                         of the existing Peñarroya/Adaro drill holes,
                                                                         description, photography. In addition,
                                                                         samples of drill core were sent to ALS
                                                                         Chemex in Canada in order to validate the
                                                                         reliability of the existing assays and
                                                                         exploration information was digitised. The
                                                                         results of Lundin’s preliminary work
                                                                         confirmed the mineral potential of the
                                                                         Toral area. However, it was apparent that
                                                                         the continuity and the thickness of the
                                                                         mineralisation were insufficiently detailed.
                                                                         Consequently, an exploration programme
                                                                         was designed to add information to the
                                                                         data set for a better understanding of the
                                                                         deposit. In 2007 to 2009, seven diamond
                                                                         holes for a total of 4,523.7m were drilled
                                                                         for the purpose of confirming the
                                                                         continuity of the mineralisation in the San
                                                                         Jose area of the Toral permit and also to
                                                                         test the possibility of an extension of the
                                                                         mineralisation at depth. GoldQuest
                                                                         acquired Lundin, including the Toral
                                                                         permit, in January 2010.
                                                                       -    During 2011 and 2012, GoldQuest
                                                                           conducted systematic geological mapping
                                                                           and soil sampling.
Geology            - Deposit type, geological setting and style of   -    The Toral permit is located in the West
                     mineralisation.                                      Asturian Leonese Zone (WALZ), one of
                                                                          the tectonostratigraphic units in the
                                                                          Variscan (or Hercynian) Orogen of the
                                                                          north-western portion of the Iberian
                                                                          Peninsula. Within the WALZ, the permit
                                                                          area is located in the domain of the
                                                                          Mondoñedo Mantle. The most significant
                                                                          mineralisation is found in the upper
                                                                          carbonate layers of the Vegadeo
                                                                          Formation, at the contact between the
                                                                          Vegadeo Formation and the younger Los
                                                                          Cabos Series. The mineralisation
                                                                          comprises sulphides interbedded in
                                                                          limestones and dolomites, within a
                                                                          silicified facies, and in chloritic breccias.
                                                                          The mineralisation is epigenetic and
                                                                          formed during a metamorphic episode
                                                                          within the Hercynian Orogeny. The
                                                                          sulphide mineral assemblage comprises
                                                                          sphalerite, galena, pyrite and
                                                                          chalcopyrite.
- Drill hole       - A summary of all information material to        - The details of drill holes material to the
  Information        the understanding of the exploration              exploration results are reported in the
                     results including a tabulation of the             body of the announcement and also in
                     following information for all Material drill      Appendix B below.
                     holes:                                          - All drill hole collar locations, easting and
                   - easting and northing of the drill hole collar     northing are given in UTM 21, ETRS89 grid,
                   - elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation        collar elevations (m), dip (°) and azimuth
                     above sea level in metres) of the drill hole      (UTM), down hole length (m).
                     collar
                   - dip and azimuth of the hole
                   - down hole length and interception depth
                   - hole length.
- Data             - In reporting Exploration Results, weighting     - The weighted average of the mineralised
  aggregation        averaging techniques, maximum and/or              intervals was calculated by multiplying the
  methods            minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of          assay of each drill sample by the length of
                     high grades) and cut-off grades are usually       each sample and dividing the sum of the
                     Material and should be stated.                    product by the down hole length sum of
                   - Where aggregate intercepts incorporate            the mineralised interval.
                     short lengths of high grade results and         - No metal equivalent values have been
                     longer lengths of low grade results, the          reported.
                     procedure used for such aggregation should      - Continuous anomaly zones reported in
                     be stated and some typical examples of            Appendix B are at >0.05% of combined
                     such aggregations should be shown in              Pb+Zn grade.
                     detail.
                   - The assumptions used for any reporting of
                     metal equivalent values should be clearly
                     stated.
- Relationship     - These relationships are particularly            - As stated in the announcement, all lengths
  between            important in the reporting of Exploration           shown including those in Appendix B are
  mineralisation     Results.                                            down hole measurements with true
  widths and       - If the geometry of the mineralisation with          widths not known.
  intercept          respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
  lengths            nature should be reported.
                   - If it is not known and only the down hole
                     lengths are reported, there should be a
                     clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down
                     hole length, true width not known’).
- Diagrams       - Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)    - Please see Appendix B showing the
                   and tabulations of intercepts should be          tabulation of the significant assay results.
                   included for any significant discovery being
                   reported. These should include, but not be
                   limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
                   locations and appropriate sectional views.
- Balanced       - Where comprehensive reporting of all           - The selected drill hole results reported
  reporting        Exploration Results is not practicable,          here are stated as being those of the
                   representative reporting of both low and         highest grades out of this drill programme.
                   high grades and/or widths should be
                   practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
                   Exploration Results.
- Other          - Other exploration data, if meaningful and      - No other substantive data has been
  substantive      material, should be reported including (but      omitted in the context of the
  exploration      not limited to): geological observations;        announcement. Any material observations
  data             geophysical survey results; geochemical          arising from further data reviews will be
                   survey results; bulk samples – size and          reported in due course.
                   method of treatment; metallurgical test
                   results; bulk density, groundwater,
                   geotechnical and rock characteristics;
                   potential deleterious or contaminating
                   substances.
- Further work   - The nature and scale of planned further        - Follow-up work is planned to evaluate
                   work (eg tests for lateral extensions or           further the data from this and earlier
                   depth extensions or large-scale step-out           programmes and will be reported with
                   drilling).                                         diagrams in due course.
                 - Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of     -   The next exploration programme will
                   possible extensions, including the main            include further modelling, drilling and
                   geological interpretations and future              metallurgical work.
                   drilling areas, provided this information is
                   not commercially sensitive.
                                   Appendix B: Toral Project Drilling Results

                                                     Drill-hole information

 Hole ID   Hole Type   Depth        Dip           Azimuth        Grid         East          North           RL              EPM
                        (m)

TOR17008     DDR       108.5         -45            211.5      ETRS89       680958.59    4710012.46       468.44         Toral 15.199

TOR17009     DDR       235.3         -45            196.7      ETRS89       680982.73    4710058.36       456.25         Toral 15.199


TOR17010     DDR       120.0         -45            197.5      ETRS89       680936.14    4710048.76       441.60         Toral 15.199

TOR17011     DDR        83.2         -45            208.0      ETRS89       680867.59    4710054.13       416.54         Toral 15.199


TOR17012     DDR       259.0         -50            28.0       ETRS89       680716.93    4709924.96       416.54         Toral 15.199

TOR17013     DDR       240.9         -50            190.2      ETRS89       681038.30    4710093.19       458.07         Toral 15.199



                                                      Significant Intercepts

                       Drillhole           from       to       length (m)      Pb %          Zn %           Pb+Zn %

                       TOR17009            140.35     141.35   1.0             1.22          9.77           10.99


                       TOR17009            141.35     142.35   1.0             3.26          1.45           4.71


                       TOR17009            140.35     142.35   2.0             2.24           5.61           7.85
                                                                               continuous anomaly zone of Pb+Zn >0.05%
                       TOR17009            134.35     144.35   10.0


                       Drillhole       from           to       length (m)      Pb %          Zn %           Pb+Zn %

                       TOR17012        176.3          177.3    1.0             0.67          16.10          16.77

                       TOR17012        177.3          178.3    1.0             0.54          1.33           1.87
                                                                                                            2.66
                       TOR17012        178.3          179.3    1.0             0.72          1.95
                                                                                                             7.10
                       TOR17012        176.3          179.3    3.0             0.64           6.46
                                                                               continuous anomaly zone of Pb+Zn >0.05%
                       TOR17012        175.3          185.3    10.0
Drillhole   from    to      length (m)   Pb %    Zn %     Pb+Zn %

                                                          18.40
TOR17013    195.8   196.8   1.0          9.29    9.11
                                                          3.16
TOR17013    196.8   197.8   1.0          2.29    0.87
                            1.0
TOR17013    197.8   198.8                6.51    6.5      13.01
                            3.0
TOR17013    195.8   198.8                6.03     5.49    11.52
                                         continuous anomaly zone   of
TOR17013    193.8   199.8   6.0          Pb+Zn >0.05%

Date: 07/09/2017 08:00:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.

Share This Story