To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

EVRAZ HIGHVELD STEEL & VANADIUM LTD - Further report in terms of Section 132(3)(a) of the Companies Act 71 OF 2008

Release Date: 10/11/2015 17:24
Code(s): EHS     PDF:  
Wrap Text
Further report in terms of Section 132(3)(a) of the  Companies Act 71 OF 2008

EVRAZ Highveld Steel and Vanadium Limited
(Incorporated in the Republic of South Africa)
(Registration No: 1960/001900/06)
Share code: EHS ISIN: ZAE000146171
(“Highveld” or “the Company”)


FURTHER REPORT IN TERMS OF SECTION 132(3)(a) OF THE COMPANIES ACT 71 OF
2008


Shareholders are advised that despite efforts to complete the Business
Rescue Proceedings of the Company within three months of the date of
commencement thereof, the proceedings have not been concluded and
therefore, as required, the Business Rescue Practitioners have prepared
a second report in terms of Section 132 (3) (a) of the Companies Act 71
of 2008 (“Act”)(“the Report”) for submission.


The Report was prepared by Piers Marsden and Daniel Terblanche, the
Joint Business Rescue Practitioners (“joint BRPs”) and should be read
in conjunction with the previous report, for actions taken during
subsequent to the published Business Rescue Plan, which are all
available on the Company’s website:


http://www.evrazhighveld.co.za/businessrescue.asp


The Report
The content of this Report is as follows:
Report to the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission and to all
Affected Persons in terms of Section 132 (3) (a) of the Companies Act
71 of 2008.


1. Introduction
   1.1.       The Business Rescue Proceedings of the Company have not been
              concluded within three months of the date of commencement
              thereof, and therefore this update report is being tabled in
              terms of section 132(3)(a) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008
              (“Act”).
   1.2.       It is important that this report is read in conjunction with
              the Business Rescue Plan (“Plan”).


2. Business Rescue Process
                                                                           1
  2.1.     The Plan was published on 15 September 2015.
  2.2.     The meeting to consider the Plan, as contemplated in terms
           of Section 151 of the Act (“the s151 Meeting”), was convened
           and held on 28 September 2015. At the s151 Meeting, the
           majority of creditors voted in favour of the s151 Meeting
           being adjourned for 2 weeks.
  2.3.     During the adjournment, a general meeting of affected
           persons was convened and held on 8 October 2015.
  2.4.     The s151 Meeting was reconvened and held on 13 October 2015.


3. The s151 Meeting
  3.1.     Amendments to the Plan:
           3.1.1. Five amendments were proposed and voted on at the
                 s151 Meeting, with no objections noted.  The
                 amendments can be found on the Company’s website or by
                 clicking on the following link:
                 http://www.evrazhighveld.co.za/BusinessRescue/Evraz%20
                 Highveld%20Steel%20-%20Business%20Rescue%20Plan%20-
                 %20S151%20%20Amendments%20&%20Results%20of%20Meeting.p
                 df


  3.2.     Voting
           3.2.1. The results of the votes are as follows:
                              Number     Total         % of     % of     Result
                                of      Value of      Votes     Votes
                              Votes    Votes Cast       in     Against
                                                      Favour
          All Creditors        357     2 371 453       79%       21%     Adopted
                                          398
          Independent          356     1 992 614       94%       6%      Adopted
          Creditors                       917


           3.2.2. The Plan was accordingly adopted.      A Plan that has
                 been adopted is binding on the Company and on each of
                 the creditors of the Company, whether or not such
                 person –
                 a) was present at the meeting;
                 b) voted in favour of the adoption of the Plan; or
                 c) in the case of creditors, had proven their claims
                      against the Company.
                                                                             2
4. Implementation of the Plan:   The Proposed Transaction
   4.1.    The joint BRPs announced the successful bidder in terms of
           the sales process during September 2015.
   4.2.    The Plan provides for the successful bidder’s offer and the
           BRPs furnished affected persons with an update in regard to
           same at the s151 Meeting.
   4.3.    Preparation of the transaction documents has commenced.


5. Proof of Claims
   5.1.    All claims are currently being reviewed by the joint BRPs
           and management. A reconciliation process is underway in
           respect of differences between the Company’s ledger and
           claim forms.
   5.2.    A mechanism for the resolution of disputed claims is
           provided for in the Plan.
   5.3.    Creditors are encouraged to submit their claims before the
           final deadline of 16 November 2015.


6. Litigation
   6.1.    Court Proceedings instituted by Global Renewable Energy
           Limited (“GRE”):
           6.1.1. On 23 September 2015, one of the unsuccessful bidders
                 in the sales process, GRE, applied to the High Court
                 to urgently interdict the BRPs from proceeding with
                 the s151 Meeting convened for 28 September 2015. The
                 BRPs opposed the urgent application and filed an
                 answering affidavit.
           6.1.2. On 25 September 2015, the presiding judge held that
                 the urgent application was an abuse of the court
                 process and struck the urgent application from the
                 roll due to lack of urgency.


   6.2.    Court Proceedings instituted by, inter alia, GRE and Bruno
           Quatro Engineering (in business rescue) (“Bruno”) as the
           intervening applicants:
           6.2.1. On 2 October 2015, GRE furnished the BRPs with an
                 amended notice of motion and replying affidavit in the
                 aforesaid application in terms of which GRE sought


                                                                          3
             urgently to inter alia interdict the adjourned s151
             Meeting convened for 13 October 2015.
       6.2.2. Furthermore, on 2 October 2015, Bruno and its
             business rescue practitioner instituted urgent
             proceedings in terms of which they sought to inter
             alia intervene in the application instituted by GRE
             and interdict the BRPs from introducing the Plan for
             consideration by creditors.
       6.2.3. The BRPs opposed the applications and filed
             affidavits before the hearing of the applications.
       6.2.4. On 9 October 2015, the presiding judge held inter
             alia that the applications were once again an abuse of
             the court process and were struck from the roll due to
             a lack of urgency.
       6.2.5. The presiding judge accordingly awarded costs to the
             Company and the BRPs, including the costs of two
             counsel.
6.3.   Court Proceedings instituted by East Metals AG (“EM”) and
       Mastercroft S.A.R.L (“Mastercroft”) (“the main
       application”):
       6.3.1. On or about 21 October 2015, EM and Mastercroft
             instituted proceedings in terms of which they seek
             inter alia to declare:
             the Plan as invalid;
             a)    that the vote which took place at the s151
                   Meeting on 13 October 2015, in terms of the
                   which the Plan was adopted, as invalid and to
                   have the vote set aside; and
             b)    that the agreement on the remuneration of the
                   joint BRPs as provided for in the Plan as
                   invalid and set aside.
       6.3.2. The Company and the joint BRPs have opposed the main
             application and will be filing their answering
             affidavit in due course.


6.4.   Court Proceedings instituted by EM and Mastercroft (“the
       urgent interdict application”):
       6.4.1. On or about 26 October 2015, EM and Mastecroft
             instituted an urgent application in terms of which
             they seek inter alia to interdict and restrain the
                                                                     4
                   Company and the BRPs from implementing the Plan in
                   respect of the Company, pending the final
                   determination of the main application.
             6.4.2. The Company and the joint BRPs have opposed the
                   urgent interdict application and have filed an
                   answering affidavit.
             6.4.3. Further updates will be furnished.
   6.5.      Court Proceedings instituted by EM and Mastercroft (“the
             substituted service application”):
             6.5.1. On or about 2 November 2015, EM and Mastecroft
                   instituted a further urgent application in terms of
                   which they seek inter alia leave of the Court to serve
                   the main application by way of substituted service.
             6.5.2. The Company and the joint BRPs have opposed the
                   substituted service application and have filed an
                   answering affidavit.
             6.5.3. Further updates will be furnished.


7. Suggested Way Forward
   7.1.      The BRPs will continue to oppose the aforesaid applications
             and implement the Plan.


8. Conclusion
   The BRPs remain of the view that there is a reasonable prospect of
   the Company being rescued.


eMalahleni
10 November 2015


J.P. Morgan Equities South Africa (Pty) Ltd.




                                                                           5

Date: 10/11/2015 05:24:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.

Share This Story