To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

KIBO MINING PLC - Rukwa Definitive Mining Feasibility Study: Update & Project Name Change to Mbeya Coal to Power Project

Release Date: 26/05/2015 08:00
Code(s): KBO     PDF:  
Wrap Text
Rukwa Definitive Mining Feasibility Study: Update & Project Name Change to Mbeya Coal to Power Project

Kibo Mining Plc 
(Incorporated in Ireland)
(Registration Number: 451931)
(External registration number: 2011/007371/10)
Share code on the JSE Limited:KBO
Share code on the AIM: KIBO
ISIN:IE00B97C0C31
("Kibo" or "the Company")

26 May 2015

Rukwa Definitive Mining Feasibility Study: Update & Project Name Change 
to Mbeya Coal to Power Project

Kibo Mining plc ("Kibo" or the "Company") (AIM: KIBO; AltX: KBO), the Tanzania focussed 
mineral exploration and development company is pleased to provide the market with a progress 
update for the Rukwa Coal to Power Project, Phase 2, Stage 1, Definitive Mining Feasibility 
Study ("DMFS"), and a formal renaming of the project, to better reflect the regional scale and size 
of the project.

Highlights
DMFS remains on schedule and well within budget;
Trade-off studies identify potential for significant operating expenditure ("OPEX") reduction 
increasing project value and profitability potential;
Blasting not required during the mining process with total over burden and inter-burden 
minable through free-digging, materially decreasing OPEX; 
Surface Continuous Miner proves to be feasible mining method;
Rukwa Coal to Power Project ("RCPP") renamed to Mbeya Coal to Power Project 
("MCPP"), with immediate effect;

Louis Coetzee, CEO of Kibo Mining, commented today: "We are extremely pleased with the 
progress of the current phase of the DMFS (Pre - Feasibility Phase). As the studies progress and the 
commercial and statutory discussions reach increasing levels of maturity, the Mbeya Coal to Power 
Project (Previously called the Rukwa Coal to Power Project) continues to demonstrate robust and 
improving project fundamentals.  

Progress made to date continues to draw attention from third parties, particularly those expressing an 
interest in investing directly at project level. In this regard the company remains in active discussions 
with various investors and now sees regular additional enquiries from new supplementary third party 
investment sources.

We are also very pleased with our new joint development partner SEPCO III, with whom an effective 
and productive working relationship has already been established in a very short space of time."

DMFS - Summary of Latest Progress

The DMFS has now reached the mid- point and trade-off studies indicate that all overburden material 
can be mined making use of free-digging and trucking. This will significantly reduce the coal mine 
OPEX. It will also bring about a significantly safer operating environment since drilling and blasting will 
no longer be required, eliminating the necessity for explosives on the mine site.

Even more exciting is the fact that the use of surface continuous mining equipment, identified as a 
possible mining method during the Concept Study, proved feasible at this stage. This will allow precise 
accuracy in extraction of the various coal seams and, more importantly, will eliminate the need for 
washing coal, making it possible to deliver the raw mined product directly into the power plant. Apart 
from the significant economic savings this will bring about, all of the above will also make significant 
contributions towards a much safer and environmentally friendly mine operation.

Preliminary geotechnical evaluations also delivered positive results and did not identify any areas of 
concern related to the coal mine development or power plant construction. An extensive geo-technical 
investigation, including a geo-technical drill campaign at the RCPP site area amongst others, is 
scheduled to commence within the next 10 - 18 days. Data and findings from the geo-technical study 
will inform critical mine design criteria that will be required for work planned during Stage 2 of the 
DMFS.

All other routine activities associated with the ongoing feasibility work are taking place in parallel and 
remain on schedule as planned. Some of these activities include the establishment of a basic automated 
weather station as well as a water testing hole. The latter will be drilled to support the mining 
environmental assessment. Similarly, discussions and interaction with the Tanzanian Government are 
ongoing as part of the process to finalise the various critical agreements between the MCPP and relevant 
government agencies.

The Company has also decided to officially change the name Rukwa Coal to Power Project 
("RCPP") to Mbeya Coal to Power Project ("MCPP"). The name change is aimed at avoiding 
further confusion of the Company's coal to power project with similarly named projects, owned by 
unrelated companies that have no relationship or association to Kibo or any of the Company's projects 
in Tanzania. The project is at the same time making major strides forward towards plant construction 
and generation and in the process unfolding the full extent of the MCPP's regional impact. The new 
name will therefore also better reflect the regional impact and presence of the project.

Contacts

Louis Coetzee
+27 (0) 83 2606126
Kibo Mining plc
Chief Executive Officer
Andreas Lianos
+27 (0) 83 4408365
River Group
Corporate Adviser and 
Designated Adviser on JSE
Elliot Hance
+44 (0) 207 382 8300
Beaufort 
Securities Limited
Broker
Oliver Morse
+61 8 9480 2500
RFC Ambrian 
Limited
Nominated Adviser on AIM
Daniel Thšle
Lucinda Alderson
+44 (0) 203 772 2500
Bell Pottinger
Investor and Media Relations

Kibo Mining - Notes to editors 

Kibo Mining is listed on the AIM market in London and the AltX in Johannesburg. The 
Company is focused on exploration and development of mineral projects in Tanzania, and 
controls one of Tanzania's largest mineral right portfolios. Tanzania provides a secure and 
stable operating environment for the mineral resource industry and Kibo Mining therein.

Kibo Mining holds a thermal coal deposit at Rukwa, which has a significant JORC compliant 
defined resource (See Table 1 below), and is developing a 250-350MW mouth-of-mine thermal 
power station with an established management team that includes Standard Bank as Financial 
Advisor.  Kibo is undertaking a Coal Mining Definitive Feasibility Study and a Power Pre-
Feasibility Study for Rukwa with initial findings to be released in the near term.

The Company also has extensive gold focused interests including Lake Victoria Goldfields and 
Morogoro projects. At Lake Victoria, the Company has projects with a 550,000oz JORC 
compliant gold Mineral Resource at Imweru Project (See Table 2 below) and a 168,000oz NI 
43-101 compliant gold Mineral Resource at Lubando Project (See Table 3 below) in which the 
Company holds a 90% attributable interest. The Company is currently undertaking a Definitive 
Feasibility Study on its Imweru Project, with Preliminary Economic Assessment study findings 
to be released in the near term. 

Kibo also holds the Haneti Nickel Project on which the latest technical report confirms 
prospectivity for nickel, PGMs, gold and strategic metals including Lithium.

Kibo Mining also holds the Pinewood (coal & uranium) project where the company has signed 
a MOU to enter into a 50/50 Exploration Joint Venture with Metal Tiger PLC.

The Company's projects are located in the established and gold prolific Lake Victoria 
Goldfields, the emerging goldfields of eastern Tanzania and the Mtwara Corridor in southern 
Tanzania where the Government has prioritised infrastructural development attracting 
significant recent investment in coal and uranium. The Company has a positive working 
relationship with the Tanzanian government at local, regional and national levels and works 
hard to maintain positive relationships with all communities where company interests are held.  
The Company recognises the potential to enhance the quality of life and opportunity for 
Tanzanian citizens through careful development of its projects.

Updates on the Company's activities are regularly posted on its website www.kibomining.com   

Technical data

Rukwa Mineral Resource
Table 1 below presents a table showing the Mineral Resource estimate for the Rukwa Coal Project. The 
table is taken from an NI 43 101-Compliant Report by GEMECS (Pty) Ltd dated April 2012.

Table 1
RUKWA COAL RESOURCE SUMMARY- GEMECS (Pty) Ltd

                                          SEAM     NI 43-101      IN SITU
SEAM                                   THICKNESS     CLASS     MILLION TONS
S4                                       1.14      Indicated       2.17
S3U                                      2.04      Indicated       6.92
S3L                                      2.3       Indicated      12.63
S2                                       3.45      Indicated      23.43
S1U                                      2.48      Indicated       7.34
S1L                                      2.92      Indicated       17.4
S0                                       1.08      Indicated       1.44
Total Indicated Resources                                         71.34

S4                                       1.31       Inferred       1.38
S3U                                      2.24       Inferred       2.94
S3L                                      2.27       Inferred       3.86
S2                                       3.42       Inferred       7.94
S1U                                      2.05       Inferred       6.5
S1L                                      3.15       Inferred      12.83
S0                                       1.06       Inferred       2.6
Total Inferred Resources                                          38.05

TOTAL RESOURCES                                                  *109.39
*Kibo holds 100% of the Rukwa Mineral Resource

Imweru Mineral Resource
Table 2 below presents a table showing the Mineral Resource estimate for the Imweru  Project  at  a 
base case economic cut-off grade for the reporting of the resource  of  0.4 g/t. The table is taken from a 
JORC-Compliant Report by Tetra Tech EBA dated February 2014.

  Table 2

Area                      Material      Classification        Cut-off      Specific      Metric       Short Tons  Gold        Contained Gold                     
                            Type                               (g/t)        Gravity     Tonnes (t)                Grade 
                                                                                                                  (g/t)        Ounces (troy)

Central
                         Laterite         Indicated            0.40          2.50       131,000       144,000    1.785            8,000
                         Saprolite        Indicated            0.40          2.50       706,000       778,000    1.387           32,000
                          Bedrock         Indicated            0.40          2.89     1,895,000     2,089,000    1.043           64,000
                           Total          Indicated            0.40          2.77     2,732,000     3,012,000    1.168          103,000

                         Laterite          Inferred            0.40          2.50       685,000       755,000    1.317           29,000
                         Saprolite         Inferred            0.40          2.50     1,047,000     1,154,000    1.040           35,000
                          Bedrock          Inferred            0.40          2.89     7,838,000     8,640,000    1.029          259,000
                           Total           Inferred            0.40          2.82     9,569,000    10,548,000    1.051          323,000

East                       Total           Inferred            0.40          2.70     2,653,000     2,925,000    1.449          124,000


Imweru Property Total
                                           Indicated           0.4           2.77     2,732,000     3,012,000    1.168           103,000
                                            Inferred           0.4           2.79    12,222,000    13,473,000    1.137           447,000

                                           Combined 
                                           (inf+ind)           0.4           2.79    14,954,000     16,485,000   1.143           550,000
*Kibo holds 90% of the Imweru mineral resource            


*   Total estimates are rounded, based on composites capped at 26 g/t gold at Imweru Central and 25 g/t at Imweru East, the cut-off grade is 
based on a gold price of US$1,200 and a 90%  metallurgical recovery is assumed in calculation of cut-off grade. A base case of  0.40  g/t 
has been selected. 

** Classification of Mineral Resources incorporates the terms and definitions from the Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration 
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) published by the Joint Ore Reserve Committee (JORC)


Lubando Mineral Resource 
Table 3 below presents a table showing the Mineral Resource estimate for the Lubando Project at a base 
case economic cut-off grade for the reporting of the resource of 0.5 g/t Au. The table is taken from an 
NI 43 101-Compliant Report by EBA Engineering Consultants Limited (now part Tetra Tech EBA) 
dated August 2009.

TABLE3: LUBANDO MINERAL RESOURCE SUMMARY - BASECASE*

Category                    West Zone     East Zone South     East Zone Mid      East Zone North        Total
Measured Resource

Measured Resource(t)        107,900           4,880             16,900               54,440            184,150
Grade(g/t)                    1.6             2.52               1.72                 2.48               1.95
Total Gold(oz)               5,900            400                 950                4,340              11,500


Indicated Resource

Indicated Resource(t)      280,710           18,330           61,000               149,350             509,420
Grade(g/t)                  1.6               2.23             1.89                  2.73               1.99
Total Gold(oz)            14,500             1,300             3,700                13,120             32,600


Inferred Resource

Total Resource(t)         1,090,000         65,470            209,340             535,330           1,900,140
Grade(g/t)                  1.2              1.56              3.34                3.13               2.03
Total Gold(oz)             44,550           3,300             22,500              53,900            124,200

* Kibo holds 90% of the Lubando mineral Resource

* Numbers are rounded. Composites capped at 10.85g/t gold. Cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold based on a gold price of US$850/oz 
and assumed 100% metallurgical recovery.CIM definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.

Pursuant to the terms of an inherited agreement with Barrick East Africa Exploration LTD (BEAL), Kibo 
currently has an effective 90% interest in the Imweru and Lubando Project (and thus a 90% attributable 
interest in the Imweru and Lubando Mineral Resources shown in Table 2 and 3 above), with Barrick having 
a 10% carried interest up to a decision to mine at which point they have to contribute or be diluted to a 2% 
net smelter royalty. BEAL also has a first right of refusal pursuant to which they can buy the 90% interest 
in the project at an agreed market related value after completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study.  Kibo 
remains the operator of the project. 

Review by Qualified Persons

The information in this announcement that relates to the Rukwa Coal Mineral Resource is taken from a 
report titled "Independent Technical Report for the Rukwa Coal Project, Mbeya Region, United Republic 
of Tanzania" dated 19th April 2012 by CD van Niekerk Director and Principal Geologist with the firm 
GEMECS (Pty) Ltd. Mr van Niekerk is a Professional Natural Scientist with the South African Council for 
Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP), Registration No. 400066/98 and a Fellow Member of the 
Geological Society of South Africa. He has relevant experience and technical qualifications to be a 
"Qualified Person" for reporting coal resources to the NI 43-101 Standard

Information in this announcement that relates to the Imweru Mineral Resource is taken from the report 
titled "Resource Update for the Imweru Property Geita Region Northern, Tanzania, JORC Competent 
Persons Report" dated February 17th 2014 (the "Report"). The Report states a JORC-compliant Mineral 
Resource estimate and was prepared for Kibo Mining plc by James Barr P.Geo. and Darryn Hitchcock 
P.Geo. Senior Geologist and Geologist respectively with TetraTech EBA Ltd. Both Mr. Barr and Mr. 
Hitchcock are registered as Certified Professional Geologists with Association of Professional Engineers 
and Geoscientists of British Columbia a recognised professional organisation. Mr Barr as principal author 
responsible for the Report has experience in the evaluation and reporting of Archaean Gold projects and is 
a "Qualified Person" for reporting gold resources to the JORC Standard. He consents to the inclusion in 
this document of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they appears. 

The information in this announcement that relates to the Lubando Mineral Resources is taken from a report 
titled  "Technical Report on the Lubando property, Mwanza, Tanzania" dated 31st  August 2009" (the 
"Report") The  Report is NI 43-101 compliant and was prepared for Great Basin Gold Rusaf Gold Limited 
by Nathan Eric Fier C.P.G., P.Eng. Market Director for EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd and a Senior 
Mining Consultant. Mr. Fieris registered as a Certified Professional Geologist with the American Institute 
of Professional Geologists, Registration No 10062, and a professional Engineer in British Columbia, 
Canada Registration No. 135165. He has extensive experience in the evaluation and reporting of Archaean 
Gold projects. 

The Company's Exploration Director, Noel O'Keeffe has reviewed the resource reports and the references 
to them in this announcement.

Johannesburg
26 May 2015
Corporate and Designated Adviser
River Group



Date: 26/05/2015 08:00:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.

Share This Story