To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

KIBO MINING PLC - Rukwa Coal to Power Project Positive Integrated Pre-Feasibility Study Report

Release Date: 10/03/2015 10:00
Code(s): KBO     PDF:  
Wrap Text
Rukwa Coal to Power Project – Positive Integrated Pre-Feasibility Study Report

Kibo Mining Plc (Incorporated in Ireland)
(Registration Number: 451931)
(External registration number: 2011/007371/10)
Share code on the JSE Limited: KBO
Share code on the AIM: KIBO
ISIN: IE00B97C031
("Kibo" or "the Company")

Dated: 10 March 2015

Rukwa Coal to Power Project - Positive Integrated Pre-Feasibility Study Report 

Kibo Mining plc ("Kibo" or the "Company") (AIM: KIBO; AltX: KBO), the Tanzania focussed 
mineral exploration and development company is pleased to announce positive findings from the 
Integrated Pre-Feasibility Study Report ("IPFS") for the Rukwa Coal to Power Project ("RCPP").

Highlights:

* Coal Mining and Power Generation technical reports now consolidated into single project 
  report for the RCPP;
* RCPP demonstrated to be robust at key consolidated financial, technical and operational 
  levels;
* Significant upward scalability in respect of power station size and life as well as additional 
  coal use opportunities;
* The IPFS report completes this key technical stage in the ongoing feasibility work on the 
  RCPP, with confirmation of the indicative commercial value of the project.

Louis Coetzee, CEO of Kibo Mining plc said "Completion of the IPFS marks a significant stage 
for the RCPP, drawing together the technical findings from the Coal Mining and Power 
Generation elements, into a consolidated report. The IPFS provides a further, more in-depth 
technical review stage, with the results once again confirming the robust nature of the RCPP 
and enabling the project to pass yet another milestone with flying colours.   

With the validation of RCPP fundamentals the IPFS substantially increases confidence in the 
project, to the benefit of the Company and relevant third parties. Completion of this stage of the 
RCPP feasibility work considerably enhances the inherent value of the RCPP and is an 
important factor in finalizing commercial partner discussions.  

We would reaffirm to investors that our commercial negotiations continue actively. We are 
managing this process carefully, with our main focus being the conclusion of a joint 
development agreement at the earliest possible opportunity. In this regard the Company recently 
held separate project site visits at the RCPP, with prospective partners. Further updates will 
follow."

IPFS Summary:

The IPFS draws together the findings of the coal mining and power generation technical reports, 
into a consolidated technical report covering the entire RCPP project. This stage of the technical 
review aims at demonstrating whether the project is viable at the consolidated level, rather than 
purely at the coal mining or power generation stages of the RCPP.  

The IPFS report utilised: the Power Pre-Feasibility report prepared by Aurecon (inclusive of a pre-
feasibility level environmental impact assessment study); the Concept Study report of the 
Definitive Mining Feasibility Study, prepared by Minxcon; and the internal financial model for the 
RCPP, based on the findings and results from the aforementioned feasibility reports and developed 
in conjunction with the Company's financial advisors.

The IPFS confirmed the fundamentals of the consolidated RCPP, demonstrating the viability of 
the project overall and thereby substantially increasing confidence levels in the ability to 
successfully develop and deliver the project.

Specifically, the IPFS has considered, validated and confirmed the following consolidated project 
fundamentals as previously announced by Kibo:

* The RCPP is robust at financial, technical and operational levels with four alternative 
  development options identified and investigated for the RCPP, with all four development 
  options proving to be financially, technically and operationally feasible;

* Indicative RCPP revenue range over an assumed 25 year life of project of approximately 
  US$8 to US$8.5 billion;

* Indicative pre-tax equity IRR above 23%; 

* Indicative post-tax payback, excluding any mitigation from potential Government 
  concessions and incentives, of approximately 7.5 to 9 years for RCPP;

* Indicative project NPV range at a 15% discount rate of US$250 to US$280 million;

* Sufficient additional coal resources available from Rukwa, to potentially expand the power 
  station to more than double the current design size and plant life and / or to be used in 
  alternate energy conversion technologies such as coal to liquids;

* Technical and environmental risk assessment did not identify any high risk concerns and 
  unanimously recommended further development of the project via feasibility analysis;

* The RCPP can be successfully constructed and commissioned within the current projected 
  timelines for completion;

* Feasibility work done to date already covers a significant amount of work beyond the 
  standard industry scope, required for pre-feasibility compliance. 

Important Notes for Readers

Readers are referred to our Definitive Mining Feasibility Study announcement of 11th December 
2014, our announcement on the Power Pre-Feasibility Study, dated 18 December 2014 as well 
related supporting data and information published on our website.

We would ask readers to note that the Company is still engaged in highly confidential discussions 
with various parties, including regulatory authorities, for whom the release of certain detailed 
financial information may cause a breach of confidentiality and normal commercial sensitivity and 
may therefore harm the Company's ability to successfully complete negotiations on the best terms 
for shareholders. 

The specific financial information provided is an extract from an early stage economic assessment 
of the RCPP made for the purposes of deciding whether to extend the study work undertaken on 
the RCPP to date. The economic assessment is based on input assumptions which will be the 
subject of further rigorous evaluation and testing during the remaining feasibility study work and 
are likely to undergo further change as the feasibility study process progresses. 

Contacts

Louis Coetzee
+27 (0) 83 2606126
Kibo Mining plc
Chief Executive Officer

Andreas Lianos
+27 (0) 83 4408365
River Group
Corporate Adviser and Designated Adviser on JSE

Jon Belliss
Abigail Wayne
+44 (0) 20 3693 1470
Hume Capital Securities Plc
Broker

Oliver Morse and Trinity McIntyre
+61 8 9480 2500
RFC Ambrian Limited
Nominated Adviser on AIM

Daniel Thöle
Lucinda Alderson
+44 (0) 203 772 2500
Bell Pottinger
Investor and Media Relations

Kibo Mining - Notes to editors 

Kibo Mining is listed on the AIM market in London and the AltX in Johannesburg. The 
Company is focused on exploration and development of mineral projects in Tanzania, and 
controls one of Tanzania's largest mineral right portfolios. Tanzania provides a secure and 
stable operating environment for the mineral resource industry and Kibo Mining therein.

Kibo Mining holds a thermal coal deposit at Rukwa, which has a significant JORC compliant 
defined resource (See Table 1 below), and is developing a 250-350MW mouth-of-mine thermal 
power station with an established management team that includes Standard Bank as Financial 
Advisor.  Kibo is undertaking a Coal Mining Definitive Feasibility Study and a Power Pre-
Feasibility Study for Rukwa with initial findings to be released in the near term.

The Company also has extensive gold focused interests including Lake Victoria Goldfields and 
Morogoro projects. At Lake Victoria, the Company has projects with a 550,000oz JORC 
compliant gold Mineral Resource at Imweru Project (See Table 2 below) and a 168,000oz NI 
43-101 compliant gold Mineral Resource at Lubando Project (See Table 3 below) in which the 
Company holds a 90% attributable interest. The Company is currently undertaking a Definitive 
Feasibility Study on its Imweru Project, with Preliminary Economic Assessment study findings 
to be released in the near term. 

Kibo also holds the Haneti Nickel Project on which the latest technical report confirms 
prospectivity for nickel, PGMs, gold and strategic metals including Lithium.

Kibo Mining also holds the Pinewood (coal & uranium) project where the company has signed 
a MOU to enter into a 50/50 Exploration Joint Venture with Metal Tiger PLC.

The Company's projects are located in the established and gold prolific Lake Victoria 
Goldfields, the emerging goldfields of eastern Tanzania and the Mtwara Corridor in southern 
Tanzania where the Government has prioritised infrastructural development attracting 
significant recent investment in coal and uranium. The Company has a positive working 
relationship with the Tanzanian government at local, regional and national levels and works 
hard to maintain positive relationships with all communities where company interests are held.  
The Company recognises the potential to enhance the quality of life and opportunity for 
Tanzanian citizens through careful development of its projects.

Updates on the Company's activities are regularly posted on its website www.kibomining.com   

Technical data

Rukwa Mineral Resource
Table 1 below presents a table showing the Mineral Resource estimate for the Rukwa Coal Project. The 
table is taken from an NI 43 101-Compliant Report by GEMECS (Pty) Ltd dated April 2012.

Table 1
RUKWA COAL RESOURCE SUMMARY- GEMECS (Pty) Ltd

                                          SEAM     NI 43-101      IN SITU
SEAM                                   THICKNESS     CLASS     MILLION TONS
S4                                       1.14      Indicated       2.17
S3U                                      2.04      Indicated       6.92
S3L                                      2.3       Indicated      12.63
S2                                       3.45      Indicated      23.43
S1U                                      2.48      Indicated       7.34
S1L                                      2.92      Indicated       17.4
S0                                       1.08      Indicated       1.44
Total Indicated Resources                                         71.34

S4                                       1.31       Inferred       1.38
S3U                                      2.24       Inferred       2.94
S3L                                      2.27       Inferred       3.86
S2                                       3.42       Inferred       7.94
S1U                                      2.05       Inferred       6.5
S1L                                      3.15       Inferred      12.83
S0                                       1.06       Inferred       2.6
Total Inferred Resources                                          38.05

TOTAL RESOURCES                                                  *109.39
*Kibo holds 100% of the Rukwa Mineral Resource



Imweru Mineral Resource
Table 2 below presents a table showing the Mineral Resource estimate for the Imweru  Project  at  a 
base case economic cut-off grade for the reporting of the resource  of  0.4 g/t. The table is taken from a 
JORC-Compliant Report by Tetra Tech EBA dated February 2014.

  Table 2

Area                      Material      Classification        Cut-off      Specific      Metric       Short Tons  Gold        Contained Gold                     
                            Type                               (g/t)        Gravity     Tonnes (t)                Grade 
                                                                                                                  (g/t)        Ounces (troy)

Central
                         Laterite         Indicated            0.40          2.50       131,000       144,000    1.785            8,000
                         Saprolite        Indicated            0.40          2.50       706,000       778,000    1.387           32,000
                          Bedrock         Indicated            0.40          2.89     1,895,000     2,089,000    1.043           64,000
                           Total          Indicated            0.40          2.77     2,732,000     3,012,000    1.168          103,000

                         Laterite          Inferred            0.40          2.50       685,000       755,000    1.317           29,000
                         Saprolite         Inferred            0.40          2.50     1,047,000     1,154,000    1.040           35,000
                          Bedrock          Inferred            0.40          2.89     7,838,000     8,640,000    1.029          259,000
                           Total           Inferred            0.40          2.82     9,569,000    10,548,000    1.051          323,000

East                       Total           Inferred            0.40          2.70     2,653,000     2,925,000    1.449          124,000


Imweru Property Total
                                           Indicated           0.4           2.77     2,732,000     3,012,000    1.168           103,000
                                            Inferred           0.4           2.79    12,222,000    13,473,000    1.137           447,000

                                           Combined 
                                           (inf+ind)           0.4           2.79    14,954,000     16,485,000   1.143           550,000
*Kibo holds 90% of the Imweru mineral resource            


*   Total estimates are rounded, based on composites capped at 26 g/t gold at Imweru Central and 25 g/t at Imweru East, the cut-off grade is 
based on a gold price of US$1,200 and a 90%  metallurgical recovery is assumed in calculation of cut-off grade. A base case of  0.40  g/t 
has been selected. 

** Classification of Mineral Resources incorporates the terms and definitions from the Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration 
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) published by the Joint Ore Reserve Committee (JORC)


Lubando Mineral Resource 
Table 3 below presents a table showing the Mineral Resource estimate for the Lubando Project at a base 
case economic cut-off grade for the reporting of the resource of 0.5 g/t Au. The table is taken from an 
NI 43 101-Compliant Report by EBA Engineering Consultants Limited (now part Tetra Tech EBA) 
dated August 2009.

TABLE3: LUBANDO MINERAL RESOURCE SUMMARY - BASECASE*

Category                    West Zone     East Zone South     East Zone Mid      East Zone North        Total
Measured Resource

Measured Resource(t)        107,900           4,880             16,900               54,440            184,150
Grade(g/t)                    1.6             2.52               1.72                 2.48               1.95
Total Gold(oz)               5,900            400                 950                4,340              11,500


Indicated Resource

Indicated Resource(t)      280,710           18,330           61,000               149,350             509,420
Grade(g/t)                  1.6               2.23             1.89                  2.73               1.99
Total Gold(oz)            14,500             1,300             3,700                13,120             32,600


Inferred Resource

Total Resource(t)         1,090,000         65,470            209,340             535,330           1,900,140
Grade(g/t)                  1.2              1.56              3.34                3.13               2.03
Total Gold(oz)             44,550           3,300             22,500              53,900            124,200

* Kibo holds 90% of the Lubando mineral Resource

* Numbers are rounded. Composites capped at 10.85g/t gold. Cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold based on a gold price of US$850/oz 
and assumed 100% metallurgical recovery.CIM definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.

Pursuant to the terms of an inherited agreement with Barrick East Africa Exploration LTD (BEAL), Kibo 
currently has an effective 90% interest in the Imweru and Lubando Project (and thus a 90% attributable 
interest in the Imweru and Lubando Mineral Resources shown in Table 2 and 3 above), with Barrick having 
a 10% carried interest up to a decision to mine at which point they have to contribute or be diluted to a 2% 
net smelter royalty. BEAL also has a first right of refusal pursuant to which they can buy the 90% interest 
in the project at an agreed market related value after completion of a Bankable Feasibility Study.  Kibo 
remains the operator of the project. 

Review by Qualified Persons

The information in this announcement that relates to the Rukwa Coal Mineral Resource is taken from a 
report titled "Independent Technical Report for the Rukwa Coal Project, Mbeya Region, United Republic 
of Tanzania" dated 19th April 2012 by CD van Niekerk Director and Principal Geologist with the firm 
GEMECS (Pty) Ltd. Mr van Niekerk is a Professional Natural Scientist with the South African Council for 
Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP), Registration No. 400066/98 and a Fellow Member of the 
Geological Society of South Africa. He has relevant experience and technical qualifications to be a 
"Qualified Person" for reporting coal resources to the NI 43-101 Standard

Information in this announcement that relates to the Imweru Mineral Resource is taken from the report 
titled "Resource Update for the Imweru Property Geita Region Northern, Tanzania, JORC Competent 
Persons Report" dated February 17th 2014 (the "Report"). The Report states a JORC-compliant Mineral 
Resource estimate and was prepared for Kibo Mining plc by James Barr P.Geo. and Darryn Hitchcock 
P.Geo. Senior Geologist and Geologist respectively with TetraTech EBA Ltd. Both Mr. Barr and Mr. 
Hitchcock are registered as Certified Professional Geologists with Association of Professional Engineers 
and Geoscientists of British Columbia a recognised professional organisation. Mr Barr as principal author 
responsible for the Report has experience in the evaluation and reporting of Archaean Gold projects and is 
a "Qualified Person" for reporting gold resources to the JORC Standard. He consents to the inclusion in 
this document of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which they appears. 

The information in this announcement that relates to the Lubando Mineral Resources is taken from a report 
titled  "Technical Report on the Lubando property, Mwanza, Tanzania" dated 31st  August 2009" (the 
"Report") The  Report is NI 43-101 compliant and was prepared for Great Basin Gold Rusaf Gold Limited 
by Nathan Eric Fier C.P.G., P.Eng. Market Director for EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd and a Senior 
Mining Consultant. Mr. Fieris registered as a Certified Professional Geologist with the American Institute 
of Professional Geologists, Registration No 10062, and a professional Engineer in British Columbia, 
Canada Registration No. 135165. He has extensive experience in the evaluation and reporting of Archaean 
Gold projects. 

The Company's Exploration Director, Noel O'Keeffe has reviewed the resource reports and the references 
to them in this announcement.


Johannesburg

10 March 2015

Corporate and Designated Adviser

River Group








Date: 10/03/2015 10:00:00 Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited ('JSE'). 
The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of
 the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, 
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
 information disseminated through SENS.

Share This Story