Wrap Text
GDO - Gold One - Results of Gold One 2012 Annual General Meeting
Gold One International Limited
Registered in Western Australia under the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth)
Registration number ACN: 094 265 746
Registered as an external company in the Republic of South Africa
Registration number: 2009/000032/10
Share code on the ASX/JSE: GDO
ISIN: AU000000GDO5
OTCQX International: GLDZY
("Gold One" or the "company")
RESULTS OF GOLD ONE 2012 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Gold One is pleased to announce the results of the company`s Annual General
Meeting held in Beijing, Johannesburg and Sydney yesterday, 23 May 2012 at 14:00
China Standard Time, 08:00 Central African Time and 16:00 Australian Eastern
Standard Time.
In accordance with section 251AA(2) of the Australian Corporations Act 2001
(Cth) and the Australian Securities Exchange ("ASX") Listing Rule 3.13.2, the
tables below set out the results of the votes cast on the items detailed in the
notice of annual general meeting dated 20 April 2012 as well as the additional
resolution dated 4 May 2012. Unless otherwise indicated, the items all
constitute ordinary resolutions. Each shareholder, present in person or by proxy
was entitled to:
- One vote per share held or represented, on a poll; and
- One vote, irrespective of the number of shares held or represented, on a show
of hands.
Resolution 1:
Adoption of Remuneration Report
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain votes
For Against (b) Discretionary exercisable
1,261,993,193 9,965 114,930 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an advisory non-binding resolution on a poll.
The results were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain % Total votes
(b) cast
1,261,933,193 99.99 14,465 0 114,930 0.01% 1,262,122,588
Voting prohibition statement for Resolution 1
A vote on this Resolution 1 may not have been cast (in any capacity) by or on
behalf of any of the following persons:
(a) A member of the Key Management Personnel, details of whose remuneration are
included in the Remuneration Report; or
(b) A closely related party of such a member.
However, a person described above may have casted a vote on Resolution 1 if:
(c) The person did so as a proxy appointed in writing that specified how the
proxy was to vote on the proposed resolution; and
(d) The vote was not cast on behalf of a person described in paragraphs (a) or
(b) above.
Resolution 2:
Re-election of Mr Yalei Sun as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain votes
For Against (b) Discretionary exercisable
1,262,061,173 6,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain % Total votes
(b) cast
1,264,811,173 100 6,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 3:
Re-election of Mr Michael Henry Solomon as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,066,173 1,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,816,173 100 1,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 4:
Re-election of Mr Allan Hui Liu as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,066,173 1,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,816,173 100 1,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 5:
Re-election of Mr Robert Tze Leung Chan as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,066,173 1,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,816,173 100 1,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 6:
Re-election of Mr Ming Liao as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,061,173 6,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,811,173 100 6,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 7:
Re-election of Mr Chao Zhou as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,066,173 1,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,816,173 100 1,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 8:
Re-election of Mr Mark Kenneth Wheatley as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,011,343 1,815 104,930 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,761,343 99.99 1,815 0 109,430 0.01 1,264,872,588
Resolution 9:
Re-election of Mr Kenneth John Winters as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,066,173 1,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,816,173 100 1,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 10:
Re-election of Mr Barry Erskine Davison as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,066,173 1,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,816,173 100 1,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 11:
Re-election of Mr Christopher Damon Chadwick as director
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,066,173 1,815 50,100 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,816,173 100 1,815 0 54,600 0 1,264,872,588
Resolution 12:
Increase in non-executive directors` fee cap
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,261,965,590 38,568 113,930 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,262,045,590 99.99 38,568 0 118,430 0.01 1,262,202,588
Voting exclusion and prohibition statement for Resolution 12
The company disregarded any votes cast on Resolution 12 by any director of the
company and their associates.
However, subject to the voting prohibition below, the company needed not
disregard a vote if:
(a) It was cast by a person as proxy for a person who was entitled to vote, in
accordance with the directions on the Proxy Form; or
(b) It was cast by the chairman as a proxy for a person who was entitled to vote
in accordance with the direction on the Proxy Form to vote as the proxy decides.
A person appointed as a proxy may not have voted, on the basis of that
appointment, on Resolution 12 if:
(a) The proxy was either:
(i) A member of the Key Management Personnel for the company; or
(ii) A closely related party of a member of the Key Management Personnel for the
company; and
(b) The appointment did not specify the way the proxy was to vote on Resolution
12.
However, the above prohibition did not apply if:
(c) The proxy was the chairman; and
(d) The appointment expressly authorised the chairman to exercise the proxy even
if the resolution was connected directly or indirectly with remuneration of a
member of the Key Management Personnel of the company.
Resolution 13:
Reappointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as auditor
Proxy votes exercisable by proxies validly appointed:
Total proxy
Abstain (b) votes
For Against Discretionary exercisable
1,262,014,175 0 103,913 250,000 1,262,368,088
The resolution was carried as an ordinary resolution on a poll. The results
were:
For (c) % Against % Abstain (b) % Total votes
cast
1,264,768,675 100 0 0 50,100 0 1,264,818,775
Notes:
(a) The total number of ordinary shares in issue (excluding treasury shares) at
the close of business on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 was 1,416,365,761
(b) A vote abstained was not a vote cast and was not counted in the calculation
of the proportion of votes `For` or `Against` a resolution.
(c) This column includes discretionary votes.
Issued by Gold One International Limited
Website: www.gold1.co.za
Johannesburg
24 May 2012
JSE SPONSOR
Macquarie First South Capital (Pty) Limited
For further information please contact:
On behalf of Gold One:
Grant Stuart
VP Investor Relations
+27 11 726 1047 (office)
+27 82 602 5992 (mobile)
grant.stuart@gold1.co.za
Carol Smith
Investor Relations
+27 11 726 1047 (office)
+27 82 338 2228 (mobile)
carol.smith@gold1.co.za
Derek Besier
Farrington National Sydney
+61 2 9332 4448 (office)
+61 421 768 224 (mobile)
derek.besier@farrington.com.au
Date: 24/05/2012 07:05:18 Supplied by www.sharenet.co.za
Produced by the JSE SENS Department.
The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the
JSE Limited (`JSE`). The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or
implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or
completeness of the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers,
employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct,
indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature,
howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on,
information disseminated through SENS.
Sharenet Sites 
