To view the PDF file, sign up for a MySharenet subscription.

THEE - Outcome of Competition Tribunal Hearings

Release Date: 28/02/2011 12:05
Code(s): JSE
Wrap Text

THEE - Outcome of Competition Tribunal Hearings OUTCOME OF COMPETITION TRIBUNAL HEARINGS (Following is a guideline for journalists. The information can be used but please do not quote Nandi Mokoena or the Tribunal) Tribunal confirms amended settlement agreement between the Commission and Sasol On Friday the Competition Tribunal confirmed an amended settlement agreement between the Commission and Sasol Chemical Industries regarding the conduct of one of its divisions, Sasol Polymers. In the agreement, Sasol admits to having contravened the Competition Act, by engaging in indirect price fixing, and agrees to pay a penalty of R111, 6 million within 60 days of the confirmation date. During Thursday`s hearing into the proposed settlement the Tribunal asked for certain changes to the consent agreement including the insertion of a mechanism to ensure that the Commission monitors the implementation of the terms of the settlement. Settlement agreements must be confirmed by the Tribunal in order to be enforceable. Background In December 2010, the Competition Commission reached a settlement with Sasol Polymers in which Sasol admitted that the supply agreement between it and Safripol (Pty) Ltd ("Safripol") resulted in indirect price fixing. In its investigation the Commission found that Sasol and Safripol engaged in collusive conduct as a result of the implementation of the supply agreement including the operation of the pricing formula and the exchange of information relating to the pricing of polypropylene. Sasol Polymers agreed to pay a penalty of R111 690 000 which represents 3% of its 2009 total annual turnover derived from polypropylene products. The Commission referred a case of collusion and excessive pricing against Sasol Chemical Industries Limited and Safripol to the Tribunal for adjudication on 12 August 2010. This settlement agreement resolves the collusion aspect of the case. In terms of the settlement, Sasol agreed to stop sharing competitively sensitive information including prices and volumes of polypropylene sold. It will also amend problematic provisions of the supply agreement to ensure that price is set independently. Following the conclusion of the agreement, the Commission filed an application for the confirmation of this settlement agreement with the Tribunal. The Commission previously concluded a consent agreement with Safripol in which it admitted contravention of the Competition Act and agreed to pay a penalty of R16, 5 million, representing 1,5% of its total annual (2009) turnover derived from polypropylene products. This consent agreement has since been confirmed by the Tribunal. At the conclusion of its investigation, the Commission found that Sasol had charged excessive prices for polypropylene and propylene to its local customers in line with import parity pricing. The Commission`s findings and allegations of excessive pricing are being contested by Sasol and are still to be heard by the Tribunal. This case was initiated in 2007 following concerns raised by the Department of Trade and Industry (dti) about polymer pricing and its negative effect on diversified growth and employment in manufacturing. Sasol is the dominant supplier of polypropylene for its own use and that of Safripol. It is also the major supplier of polypropylene to the South African market. Polypropylene is a plastics polymer used by plastics converters to manufacture a wide range of products. Issued By: Nandi Mokoena PR Consultant: Competition Tribunal Cell: +27 (0) 82 399 1328 E-mail: NandisileM@live.co.za On Behalf Of: Lerato Motaung Registrar: Competition Tribunal Tel: (012) 394 3355 Cell: +27 (0) 82 556 3221 E-Mail: LeratoM@comptrib.co.za Date: 28/02/2011 12:05:01 Supplied by www.sharenet.co.za Produced by the JSE SENS Department. The SENS service is an information dissemination service administered by the JSE Limited (`JSE`). The JSE does not, whether expressly, tacitly or implicitly, represent, warrant or in any way guarantee the truth, accuracy or completeness of the information published on SENS. The JSE, their officers, employees and agents accept no liability for (or in respect of) any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential loss or damage of any kind or nature, howsoever arising, from the use of SENS or the use of, or reliance on, information disseminated through SENS.

Share This Story