California urges Trump administration to abandon fuel rule plan
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (Reuters) - California's top air
regulator urged the Trump administration on Sunday to abandon a
plan to freeze fuel efficiency standards through 2026, as
automakers urged state and federal regulators to reach agreement
to extend nationwide rules.
Mary Nichols, who chairs the state's Air Resources Board,
asked the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) and Environmental Protection Agency to reverse course,
saying the plan to freeze requirements at 2020 levels "turns its
back on decades of progress in cleaning up cars and trucks."
The Trump administration also wants to revoke California’s
authority to set its own strict tailpipe emissions rules and
mandate the sale of electric vehicles. California is moving
ahead with setting its own rules, and 19 states said in August
they would challenge the rollback in court.
"California will take the necessary actions to protect our
people and follow the law. It is not too late to choose a better
way," Nichols said in testimony made public on Sunday that she
will deliver on Monday in Fresno, California.
It is the first of three cities where U.S. regulators will
hear public comments on the plan this week. Regulators on Friday
rejected a request from automakers, 32 U.S. senators and states
to extend the comment period by two months.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group
representing General Motors Co, Volkswagen AG
, Toyota Motor Corp, Ford Motor Co and
others, again urged California and the Trump administration to
reach agreement to retain nationwide emissions rules and avoid a
prolonged legal battle.
The group avoided comments on most specifics in the Trump
proposal, but backed unspecified fuel efficiency increases and
incentives for electric vehicles.
The automotive group will say in testimony released on
Sunday for delivery in Fresno that "automakers support continued
improvements in fuel economy while balancing priorities like
affordability, safety, jobs, and the environment."
The Trump plan would hike U.S. oil consumption by about
500,000 barrels per day by the 2030s but reduce automakers
regulatory costs by more than $300 billion.
Nichols' testimony dismissed central Trump administration
arguments: that the rules will save up to 12,700 motorists lives
over the coming decades because they lower the price of new
vehicles, prod people into buying safer newer vehicles faster
and result in motorists driving less because gas-guzzling
vehicles will cost more to operate.
"These claims are not only absurd on their face; they are
not supportable by fact," Nichols wrote.
An EPA memo released in August said some officials believed
the plan would actually increase traffic deaths from 2036
through 2045 because of increasing vehicle travel.
(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Peter Cooney)
© 2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Thomson Reuters or its third party content providers. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. "Reuters" and the Reuters Logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.